There are burdens in Anguilla that cannot be measured by bank accounts, electricity bills, or the price of groceries. They do not show up in headlines or parliamentary debate. Yet they are carried quietly every day inside homes, churches and ordinary conversations that end with “I’m good” even when the truth is far more complicated. Emotional strongholds, those unseen weights of guilt, fear, shame, worry, and unforgiveness, remain some of the most powerful forces shaping how people live, love, and hope.

The theme emerged with striking clarity during reflections inspired by a presentation at the 13th Biennial Conference of the Anglican Church Women Association, where Dr. Michelle Queeley challenged listeners to think about prison in a different way. Not the kind with concrete walls and iron bars, but the kind people carry in their minds. Her message lingered beyond the conference setting because it spoke directly to something deeply familiar in life – the habit of appearing strong even when hurting.

She began with a simple question: have you ever visited someone in prison and how did it feel? The answers were immediate and emotional – sad, heavy, overwhelming. Everyone understood that kind of confinement. But the deeper question followed quietly: what about the prisons no one can see? The ones built from regret, rejection, disappointment, or fear of tomorrow. Where resilience is almost a cultural expectation, those invisible cells are easy to hide behind politeness, laughter, and Sunday morning clothes.

The uncomfortable truth is that many people are walking around free in body but bound in spirit. They go to sleep with the same thoughts that trouble them all day and wake up carrying them again, performing strength for the world while privately feeling stuck. Silence makes the struggle heavier. When pain has no language, healing has no doorway. And when entire communities learn to hide hurt, misunderstanding quietly replaces compassion.

Part of the difficulty is recognising what emotional strongholds really are. They are not just bad days or passing moods. They are patterns – ways of thinking and feeling that settle in so deeply they begin to feel normal. A voice that keeps replaying old mistakes. A constant expectation that something will go wrong. A refusal to release past hurt because letting go feels like losing justice. Over time, these patterns shape decisions, relationships, and even dreams. Freedom becomes harder to imagine, not because it is impossible, but because captivity has become familiar.

Across generations, the same inner battles repeat themselves. Guilt whispers that you should be further along in life. Worry steals sleep with problems that have not even happened. Unforgiveness keeps old wounds fresh, as though time never moved. Shame tells people their past has cancelled their future. None of these voices shout, yet all of them influence how a person walks through the world, what risks they take, what love they accept, what future they believe they deserve.

These strongholds rarely appear without reason. They often grow out of real pain – harsh words spoken in childhood, relationships that broke trust, opportunities that disappeared, grief that never fully healed. Experiences become thoughts, thoughts become beliefs, and beliefs begin steering the direction of a life. When fear or falsehood sits in the driver’s seat, the journey bends accordingly. That is why emotional and spiritual wellbeing can never be separated from the renewal of the mind.

Renewal sounds simple, but it is deeply intentional work. It asks a person to challenge the stories they have believed for years and replace them with something truer, something kinder, something rooted in faith rather than failure. It does not pretend pain never happened. Instead, it dares to ask whether pain might still produce wisdom, strength, or purpose. The question slowly changes from “Why me?” to “What now?” – and that shift, small as it seems, can open space for healing.

But healing has never been meant to happen alone. Caribbean life is built on community – family members who show up unasked, church sisters who pray without being told the full story, neighbours who notice when something feels off. There is quiet power in that togetherness. Sometimes freedom begins not with a grand breakthrough, but with someone sitting beside you long enough for honesty to feel safe. Strength is often remembered in the presence of another person who refuses to let you forget it.

Perhaps the most hopeful image to emerge from this reflection is the idea that the prison door is already open. Not that suffering is imaginary, but that release is closer than it feels. Freedom may begin with a difficult conversation, an apology offered, counselling accepted, or truth finally spoken aloud. Small steps, almost invisible at first. Yet every step weakens the walls that once felt permanent.

People are becoming more willing to talk about mental health, trauma, and emotional resilience, though stigma still lingers in quiet corners. The growing openness matters. A healthier nation is not built only through roads, policies, or economic plans, but through people who are emotionally whole enough to love well, lead wisely, and hope again.

Freedom, then, is rarely dramatic. More often, it is gentle and stubborn – arriving in moments of honesty, forgiveness, faith, and community. And as more people find the courage to walk out of their invisible prisons, the island itself becomes lighter. Not perfect, not pain-free, but freer in the ways that matter most.

Chapter IV of our 1982 Anguilla Constitution Order established the House of Assembly with respect to membership and structure in its initial sections. These are followed by a similar framework for the voters who elect our House members. Yet again, the Constitution presents the absurdity of keys left in the locks, whereby voting rules may be changed by any future laws. [1]

Qualification of voters
Section 43 enumerates qualifications to vote with respect to age [18; whereas the candidates must be at least 21], citizenship [Anguillian – or Commonwealth?], residency [Anguilla] and registration [voter initiated if qualified]:
“Subject to the next following subsection a person shall be qualified to be registered as a voter in an electoral district [and the single electoral district, 2019] if he is of the age of eighteen [18] years and upwards and—is [an Anguillian, 2019], and is domiciled there at the qualifying date; or…who has resided in Anguilla for a period of not less than twelve [12] months immediately before the qualifying date, and is domiciled there at that date, and is the lawful spouse, widow or widower, or the son or daughter or the spouse of such son or daughter of a person who was born in Anguilla; or is a Commonwealth citizen domiciled in Anguilla and has resided there for a period of at least five [5] years immediately before the qualifying date; and is at the qualifying date resident in the electoral district in which he claims to be registered [and]… entitled to be so registered provided that a person shall not be registered as a voter in more than one electoral district.”[1,2]

Disqualification of voters
Section 44 then echoes the disqualifying constraints for members of the House for voters, including:
“…[being] under sentence of death imposed on him by a court in any [country, 1990], or is under a sentence of imprisonment (by whatever name called) exceeding twelve months imposed on him by such a court or substituted by competent authority for some other sentence imposed on him by such a court [and if the offense would also be such in Anguilla, 1990]…[or] certified to be insane or otherwise adjudged to be of unsound mind under any law in force in Anguilla; or is disqualified for registration as a voter by any law in force in Anguilla relating to offences connected with elections.”[1,3]
Subsection 2 continues, “For the purposes of …the preceding subsection—two or more terms of imprisonment that are required to be served consecutively shall be regarded as a single term… for the aggregate period of those terms; and no account shall be taken of a sentence of imprisonment imposed as an alternative to, or in default of the payment of, a fine.” [1] This holds the voters to the same standards as the members.

Right to vote at elections
Section 45 ensures the right to vote, if registered in a geographic [and the single electoral, 2019] district… Well, “unless he is prohibited from so voting by any law in force in Anguilla—because he is a returning officer; or because he has been concerned in any offence connected with elections.” [1,2]
Further, “No person shall vote at any election for any electoral district who—is not registered as a voter in that district; has voted in another electoral district at the same election; is in lawful custody; or is for any other reason unable to attend to vote in person (except in so far as it may be provided by law that persons unable so to attend may vote).” [1] Hmm. Would some want to turn that key if such a future law could enfranchise those “unable to attend to vote in person” due to business, education or medical care – and the entire diaspora – by removing residency requirements to vote?

Laws as to elections
Speaking of which, Section 46 enumerates laws they envisioned in 1982, saying, “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature may provide for the election of members of the Assembly, including (without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power) the following matters, that is to say— a) the qualifications and disqualifications of voters and candidates; b) the registration of voters; c) the ascertainment of the qualification of voters and of candidates for election; d) the division of Anguilla into electoral districts for the purpose of elections; e) the holding of elections;” Hmm. Sounds like residency qualifications could change with a single trip to the House and a single law!
But beyond laws regulating voting and elections processes, this Chapter also considered laws for, “f) the determination of any question whether any person has been validly elected a member … or whether the seat of any elected member… has become vacant; g) the definition and trial of offences connected with elections and the imposition of penalties therefor, including the disqualification for membership… or for registration as a voter or for voting at elections, of any person concerned in any such offence; h) and the disqualification for election as members… of persons holding or acting in any office the functions of which involve any responsibility for, or in connection with, the conduct of any election or the compilation or revision of any electoral register.” [… = “of the Assembly”; 1]
And in 2019, the amendment enshrined legislative powers to enact a single island-wide district, to determine how many single district members may be “returned” to the House, and empower voters to choose their own district leadership – as well as vote for as many seats as established from the island-wide slate.[2]

Residency Requirements, Policy Politics – and GST
And back to the democratic debate about our diaspora and whether they should be welcomed home to vote, or if the Home of AI can offer a secure, virtual means to enfranchise those defined as “Anguillians” no matter where they reside. Notably, “As of 2020 a total of 141 countries grant non-residents such as emigrants or expatriates the right to non-resident citizen voting…[including] in person at diplomatic missions or other physical locations, by post or online…[for] the national legislature, executive elections, referendums, or sub-national elections.” [4]
Many may recall, however, that the election of 2020 was believed to effectively exclude the diaspora due to Covid closures, helping the party that ran against GST to win 7 of 11 seats without widespread whispers of hushed homecomings. Then again, in 2025, with the borders wide open, the party that ran against GST won 8 of 11 seats. Hmm. Old fables of family voting seem to have faded, because the electorate appears to have voted more on policy than progeny in recent years.
On this topic, the Constitution seems clear: That a single trip to the House to pass a new law could enfranchise all proudly proven Anguillians – without need for Constitutional review or revision. Likewise, we saw on July 29, 2025, that a culturally intrusive law that contravened prior Constitutional rights could be repealed with a single vote in the House.[5] So. Will we join other countries by officially enfranchising our People, including all Anguillians, through leading-edge tech, as our new moniker suggests? And… will the next election be won by those running against the continuing civil rights challenges of the General Services Tax (GST) – or by those who can say they repealed it?

Repeal General Services Tax – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1] The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] The Anguilla Constitution (Amendment) Order 2019; [3] The Anguilla Constitution (Amendment) Order 1990; [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-resident_citizen_voting; [5] General Services Act, 2025.

They came to Anguilla for a funeral. Not the kind of trip anyone plans with excitement—flights to arrange, black clothing and sadness folded into suitcases, conversations heavy with memory. Grief brought our family together, but once we were here, we realized that though this moment was born of loss it was also an opportunity––an opportunity to ensure that younger generations feel connected to this place we call home.

Some were visiting for the first time. Others had been away for far too long. We wanted them to see Anguilla—not the postcard version, but the Anguilla that shaped us; the one that existed before paved roads and modern conveniences. To take us on this journey, we reached out to our cousin Carl Webster (CJ). CJ is young, but as we learned over the course of a few hours, he carries a deep knowledge of Anguilla’s history. He rattled off dates, names, and events with ease, pointing out ruins, former plantations, old wells, and forgotten spaces hidden beneath brush. What might have look like overgrown land to us, he described as living chapters of our island’s story.

Time was short, so we made the most of it. We stopped at the Miriam Gumbs Home to visit Daddie (Eldridge “Coo” Webster)—biological father to some of those visiting, but ‘Daddie’ to us all. Though CJ did not speak much there, history still found its way into the conversation. Coo shared stories of his days of sailing between the islands taking produce and bringing back supplies and other goods to Anguilla.

We visited the Old Courthouse which now holds the Heritage Museum Collection. While we were unable to experience a full tour of the facility, we stood in a space that became deeply personal to our family. One of our ancestors, Augustus “Chappy” Vanterpool, spent time in the lower level of the courthouse––as a prisoner. We shared stories and learned of Chappy’s adventures including his daring breaks from the prison on more than one occasion.

CJ explained how changes had been made to the building over the years. We saw where prisoners were once held. He described the physical constraints they endured; the thick walls––made from local limestone rock, the strategic layout, and separation of spaces––each telling their own story of a bygone era.
We lingered there longer than expected, imagining how our great-great-grandfather must have felt. He was tall, so we joked that perhaps he simply stepped through a window to make his escape. But beneath the laughter was something more complicated—a clearer understanding of the choices that led him there and the confines he existed in. In that moment Anguilla’s history was personal.
From there, we made a short visit to Wallblake House, walking the grounds and exploring nearby ruins. There is something about ruins that forces one’s imagination to fill in the blanks. We shared our thoughts on how workers may have moved among those spaces serving those who live at the house.
As the sun began to set, CJ took us to an area in South Hill––the Hughes Plantation. Not all of us ventured into the bush, but we were all struck by something else entirely—how much more mature CJ seemed in just those few short hours. His passion for the island’s past was unmistakable.

By the end of the day, something had shifted. We still admired the beaches and the hotels that draw visitors to our island. But we were reminded that Anguilla is more than sand, sea, and sun. It is more than stone foundations and overgrown fields. It is the preserved and unpreserved plantation houses. It is oral stories carried forward—by young people determined not to let them fade. It is home.
We were not able to visit every site CJ had planned, but what began as a week of sadness ended with us feeling more grounded. We left with a deeper understanding that while Anguilla continues to evolve, its history stands—not as a relic, but as foundation.

In next week’s issue, we will share CJ’s views on preserving and sharing Anguilla’s history.

By Kareen Rogers

In our 1982 Anguilla Constitution Order – the House of Assembly is the workplace of our elected representatives to debate opportunities and challenges to address through policies and legislation. However, limitations set forth in preceding sections with respect to the Governor’s, Deputy Governor’s and Attorney Generals’ (AG) powers provide a context for concern. [1]

“There shall be a House of Assembly” – of Anguillians

Section 35 begins Chapter IV of the Constitution simply stating that Anguilla will have a House of Assembly, and that it shall “consist of – the Speaker” and “two ex-officio members, namely the Attorney General” and in 1990, the Deputy Governor replaced the PS Finance – and “not less than seven members elected in the manner provided by law”. There were two nominated members until 2019, when four elected “single district” seats were added.[1,2,3] Having the People choose them strengthened the democracy, but they kept two appointees accountable to the monarch, not the People. Baby steps.

House of Assembly Qualifications

Section 36 continues with qualifications, including voter registration in an electoral district, twenty-one years of age, and birth ? and residence ? in Anguilla “at the date of his nomination for election”; or living in Anguilla for at least 3 years before and on “the date of his nomination … and is the son or daughter [or grandchild, 2019], of parents at least one of whom was born in Anguilla.’[1,2] Whereas residency is under growing scrutiny for voters, but less so for parliamentarians.

House of Assembly Disqualifications

Section 37 counters, saying, “No person shall be qualified to be nominated or elected as a member of the Assembly who— holds or is acting in any office of emolument in the service of the Crown” [exclusive of “his services as such a member” – and for temporary appointees, see Section 40] …or who is “adjudged or otherwise declared bankrupt… certified to be insane or otherwise adjudged to be of unsound mind… under sentence of death imposed on him by a court in any [country, 2019] or is under a sentence of imprisonment… exceeding twelve months [for an offense also recognised under Anguillian law, 2019]…or is disqualified for membership of the Assembly by any law… relating to offences connected with elections.”[1,2] That’s reassuring, except that any future law can amend the constitution.

The Section then details how “two or more terms of imprisonment” can be treated as one, but they would not be disqualifying if imposed as an alternative to a fine. Would Mandela have been qualified?

Tenure of office of members of Assembly

Section 38 then describes how a “nominated or elected” member’s seat becomes “vacant” to define the term of office – “upon a dissolution of the Assembly…if, without prior notice to the Governor, he is absent from three consecutive meetings… ceases to be [an Anguillian, 2019]… to be resident … resigns his seat by writing … to the Governor…” or if any of the preceding – or following – reasons should apply. [1,2]

Section 39 stipulates that being sentenced to death – or imprisonment for over 12 months – would vacate the member’s seat “thirty days thereafter” but that the Speaker could add 30-day increments for up to 330 days, if requested for appeals. However, the period could extend further if approved by “the Assembly signified by resolution.” [1] Well, if not put to death by then.

That said, Clause 2 states that “a free pardon or [if] his conviction is set aside or his sentence is reduced to a term of imprisonment of less than twelve months or a punishment other than imprisonment is substituted, his seat in the Assembly shall not become vacant…and he may again perform his functions.”[1] While a convicted member seems undesirable, these allowances pay deference to the will of the People and the risk of unjust laws, well, assuming the member kept his or her election promises.

Appointed members of Assembly

Section 40 states that an appointed member’s absence due to “illness… absence from Anguilla or for any other reason incapable of performing” … “the Governor acting in his discretion may, by… public seal, appoint any public officer to be temporarily a member of the Assembly” at the monarch’s “pleasure” and shall vacate his seat when “informed by the Governor” that the appointee can resume his duties. Nonetheless, it requires that “any public officer” be held to the same standards as the ex-officio member,[1] despite the contradiction regarding emoluments in Section 37.

In 1990, an amendment also empowered the Governor to appoint the leader of the opposition if, in the Governor’s judgement, he represents an opposition party with the greatest “numerical strength” in the House, or “best able to command the support of the [opposition] members.”[3] So, the Governor can anoint the Opposition and appoint two House members accountable to the Crown, but not the People.

Determination of questions as to membership of Assembly

Section 41 anticipated challenges to membership. The validity of being appointed or vacating a seat as “a temporary member of the Assembly…shall be determined by the Governor acting in his discretion.” [1,2] Whereas questions of elected membership or vacated seats “shall be determined by the High Court, whose decision shall be final and not subject to any appeal.” While few individuals have the resources to appeal to the High Court, Section 41 gives the right to challenge an elected member to “a person who voted or had the right to vote at the election…a person claiming to have had the right to be returned at such election… alleging himself to have been a candidate at such election; or the Attorney-General.” [1] However, only an elected member of the Assembly or the AG can apply to the High Court to question if an elected member has vacated his seat.

But this section reserves one more power to the AG, saying, “If any application referred to in …this subsection is made by a person other than the Attorney-General, the Attorney-General may intervene and may then appear or be represented in the proceedings.” [1] Appointed by the Crown, could the AG also terminate such challenges, no matter the concerns of an elected member?

Penalty for sitting or voting in Assembly when un-qualified

Section 42 puts a bow on member decorum, saying, “Any person who sits or votes in the Assembly knowing or having reasonable grounds for knowing that he is not entitled to do so shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding EC$100.00 for each day upon which he sits or votes” and that the fine may be collected by civil action in the High Court or a suit by the AG. [1] Ah, if only.

Appointed members over-riding elected members’ votes

Ultimately, these House of Assembly sections expose the gulf between the law and recent customs of ex-officio members. That is, to refrain from voting on contentious matters that could have far-reaching impact on a society or the financial framework of the territory. And for the AG to recuse himself when giving legal advice to members of parliament. Had such customs been followed in 2021, GST would not have passed – and the current Government would not have had to compromise by passing the General Services Tax Act in 2025, which reimposed lost rights and fiscal fetters on our People and businesses when they, in fact, repealed GST.[4] A better way? The House of Assembly members “shall be elected in the manner prescribed by any law in force in Bermuda.” [5] Elected. Not appointees with voting rights.

So. Will Anguilla consider best practices for internal self-governance, with guardrails on appointees and the Governor’s discretion? And… will checks and balances be enshrined to prevent – or to fast-track the repeal – of newly oppressive laws put forth by appointees unaccountable to the People?

Repeal General Services Tax – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.

[1] The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] The Anguilla Constitution (Amendment) Order 2019; [3] The Anguilla Constitution (Amendment) Order 1990; [4] General Services Act, 2025; [5] Bermuda Constitutional Order 1968; Section 28 amended by UK SI 456/2003.

The Anguilla Tourist Board (ATB) is pleased to announce the appointment of Mrs. Kendisha Hall-Prentice to the position of Chief Marketing Officer, effective January 16th, 2026.
This milestone appointment marks the first time an Anguillian has been appointed to the Chief Marketing Officer role at the ATB. This reflects the Agency’s continued investment in strengthening local leadership and advancing a modern performance-driven marketing agenda for the destination. Mrs. Hall-Prentice brings a strong foundation in hospitality and tourism marketing, hospitality education, destination management, and entrepreneurship, alongside a deep personal commitment to showcasing Anguilla’s culture, people, and world-class tourism product on the global stage.

As Chief Marketing Officer (CMO), Mrs. Hall-Prentice will provide strategic leadership to strengthen Anguilla’s brand positioning and marketing performance, supporting integrated destination marketing initiatives that elevate awareness, increase demand, and deepen engagement across priority and emerging markets. The CMO role is pivotal to ensuring Anguilla’s brand remains competitive and cohesive across communications, trade and public relations, content and storytelling, and digital and creative marketing, while maintaining strong alignment with the Anguilla Tourist Board’s broader tourism objectives.
“This appointment represents a proud and meaningful moment for Anguilla. Having the first Anguillian serve as Chief Marketing Officer at the Anguilla Tourist Board reinforces our commitment to empowering local talent at the highest levels and strengthening the national capacity needed to compete globally,” said Mr. Cardigan Connor, Minister of Health, Tourism and Sports. Minister Cardigan Connor further expressed that, “Mrs. Hall-Prentice brings passion, expertise, and a strong understanding of our destination, and I am confident her leadership will support continued growth and elevated marketing performance.”
In underscoring the importance of the Chief Marketing Officer’s role, this appointment marks a meaningful progression in strengthening performance-driven destination marketing and modernizing the agency’s approach. The Director of Tourism, Mr. Jameel Rochester stated that, “the Chief Marketing Officer’s role is central to building a more strategic, and innovative marketing function, which accelerates brand growth, deepen stakeholder partnerships, and ensures our marketing investment delivers measurable results, while remaining true to the authenticity and excellence that defines Anguilla.”
In expressing her interest in the position, Mrs. Hall-Prentice emphasized her dedication to Anguilla and her belief that the island’s unique product should be shared globally in a way that is both innovative and sustainable, supported by collaborative leadership and creative marketing strategies.

“Anguilla is more than a destination—it is a feeling, a standard of excellence, and a place that captures hearts the moment you arrive. I am deeply honored to serve as Chief Marketing Officer and to champion a destination I genuinely love. I look forward to working with our partners and stakeholders to elevate Anguilla’s global brand, drive meaningful demand, and firmly position the island as the number one destination in the Caribbean. The opportunity to tell Anguilla’s story with authenticity, innovation, and pride is one I embrace wholeheartedly,” Mrs. Hall-Prentice said.
Prior to joining the Anguilla Tourist Board, Mrs. Kendisha Hall-Prentice built a strong foundation in tourism and hospitality, with experience extending to destination marketing and promotions, brand development, and stakeholder engagement. Her work has been grounded in strengthening market visibility, enhancing visitor experiences and engagements, and supporting strategies that drive measurable results for the tourism sector.
Mrs. Hall-Prentice also brings valuable private sector perspective, having worked alongside industry partners and tourism stakeholders to advance business development and elevate service standards aligned with premium destination positioning. She is further supported by academic and professional training in tourism and marketing, reinforcing the analytical, strategic, and creative skillset required to guide a forward-looking, high-impact marketing roadmap for Anguilla.

At Four Seasons Resort and Residences, we are committed to identifying and developing talent and this 2025/2026 Season, we are proud to share that three (3) employees thus far have been promoted to supervisory or managerial positions.
We wish to recognize and congratulate all our employees on their upward movement and specific mention is made of the following:

Tiffany Moore – Tiffany joined the Team as a Greeter in 2019. In 2021, Tiffany then joined the Food and Beverage Department as a Hostess and in 2023, transitioned to the Sales and Marketing team as the Social Media Specialist. Tiffany has now assumed the role of Marketing Supervisor.

Kishma King – Kishma began her journey with Four Seasons in October 2016 as a Front Desk Agent and transitioned to several roles, including Concierge, Greeter, and Overnight Agent. She subsequently joined the Reservations team as Group Reservations Specialist. She has now been promoted to the role of Executive Administrative Assistant.

Alecia Rawlins – In 2016, Alecia joined the Team as a Cook 3. In 2022 she was promoted to Cook 2 and quickly elevated to Chef de Partie that same year. Alecia has now been promoted to the role of Sous Chef.
We are also delighted to welcome new talent to the management team, namely, Katie Hawkins as the Assistant Guest Services Manager.

We are extremely proud of our employees, and we remain committed to their success.

The name “Menes” invariably strikes a note of fond familiarity for a man of high honour in the Anguillian community. As a consequence, the morning of Friday, January 30th saw a show of solemn support and love as all-and-sundry converged at the Pro-Cathedral of St. Mary in The Valley to pay their last respects to the life of this noble man, Reverend Father Vanier Menes Hodge.

Rev. Father Menes Hodge was truly “a man of the cloth”. According to an extract from the pages of his Formal Remembrance his profound and enduring legacy was within the Anglican Church, where he had answered the call of God with humility and resolve.

The funeral service began with several video presentations dedicated to the Reverend’s memory and snapshots of reflections on his life were read from his eulogy by two of his sons, Arnie and Trevor.
The reflections spanned a scope of history that chronicled the Reverend’s childhood; his upbringing; his education; his diligent apprenticeship as a carpenter, then as an Agricultural Officer in the Public Service; his dedication as a Customs Officer; his professionalism as a Director of Broadcasting at Radio Anguilla; his loyalty as a Principal Assistant Secretary in the Chief Minister’s Office; and his epic service as a devoted member of the Rotary Club.
Rev. Father Menes Hodge was an avid Commissioner of Scouts, and attained the Silver Acorn award for prolonged service in Scouting. He was naturally “always prepared” even as the Scouts Motto dictates. It was this mode of preparation that caused him to answer the call of God in 1975 as a Lay Reader in St. Mary’s Anglican Church, becoming ordained to the Diaconate in 1993. He further advanced the call of God into Christian service through his ordination to the Holy Priesthood in 1996.

His funeral service proceeded as undertakers wheeled his casket up the aisle, led by opening sentences pronounced by the Right Reverend Ernest Flemming, Bishop of the Diocese of the North Eastern Caribbean and Aruba, accompanied by Priest in charge, Canon Reid Simon. The hymn “How Great Though Art” was sung, followed by the first scripture reading delivered by Reverend Hodge’s daughter, Menesa Campbell, Esq.

The singing of Psalm 23 preceded the second reading by his son, Vanroy Hodge. The Combined Choir then melodiously sang Richard Smallwood’s signature song “Healing”. The Gospel from St. John 14:1-6 was read by Canon Reid Simon. Reverend Hodge’s younger brother, the Venerable Valentine Hodge presented the sermon. Prior to delivering the actual sermon, however, he conveyed words of comfort to the children of Reverend Hodge from the extended family.

“I am sure I would be speaking on behalf of everyone here today, together with those sharing in the various media, in extending our most sincere condolences and the assurance of our prayers to Menes’s four children, Ash, Trevor, Vanroy and Menesa and their families. At the same time, we wish to remember with gratitude his wife Britannia, deceased, and his daughters Joy and Mathis who have preceded their dad in death.
“Condolences go out also to his siblings, Elvese in Texas, Stafford in Virginia, Joycelyn in the UK and Roy of the Virgin Islands who is with us here today.”

“Recently I found on Facebook,” he continued, “where someone was lauding the ideals of family life, saying that there is nothing like family. That is a sentiment which I would readily endorse.” “I wish that more people would recognize the value of family bonds and the need for unity within the family.”

Archdeacon Emeritus Valentine Hodge reminisced growing up with Menes, and he reflected upon the youthful days of their development, especially their experiences in riding a 2-horsepower Triumph Tiger Cub motorbike. He spoke about the many falls they sustained and said, “We both learnt how to recover from falling only by falling. By falling off that bike several times, we eventually learnt what balance feels like. And people who have never fallen are actually riding life off balance.”

Then, focusing on the sermon, he elaborated on St. John 13: 12-15. He explained how Jesus, the master teacher, taught his disciples the valuable lesson of Christian service, demonstrating the lesson of humility. He explained that as Christ washed the feet of His followers, He required them to wash one another’s feet, likewise, even as he was humble enough to wash theirs.

“My Brothers and sisters,” he charged, “more and more in our world today we need people who are willing to serve others rather than to be served. We need more persons who are willing to wash the feet of others rather than just to have their own feet washed.”

“It is for this reason that service above self should become the motto of all Christ-like people,” he stressed. “So we see that Father Menes’ life was characterized by service to humanity. And in this way he tried to imitate his Master, our blessed Lord.”
Following the sermon, the Holy Communion was offered, followed by the Prayer of Thanksgiving, A Hymn (Lead Us Heavenly Father Lead Us), The Commendation, the Nunc Dimittis, and The Blessing. The final hymn sung was “To God be the Glory”. The interment took place at a plot, just a stone’s throw from the church building.

As a tribute to his fatherhood, his surviving children have borrowed a line from the pen of Focus on the Family’s James Dobson: “A Good father will leave his imprint on his children for the rest of their lives.”

May his soul rest in perpetual peace.

Primex Concrete Services has announced a major step toward improving Anguilla’s road infrastructure, following significant investments in both asphalt production and chip and seal technology—an approach the company believes can provide more affordable and durable solutions to the long-standing road challenges across the island.

For decades, residents have expressed frustration with the condition of dirt roads, particularly in communities where access, dust, and maintenance issues have affected daily life. In response, Primex Concrete Services has purchased and brought to Anguilla a chip and seal machine, and the company is now seeking to partner with the Government of Anguilla to expand local road construction and rehabilitation services.

In March of 2025, Principals of Primex, Jerome Richardson and Mark Jno Baptiste, met with Minister Cordell Richardson and Minister Jose Vanterpool to discuss the company’s plans to enter the road construction space. During the meeting, Primex outlined its recent acquisition and repairs to an asphalt plant located on its premises in the Brimegin area. Primex, as a result, is interested in offering cost-effective road development alternatives that could be deployed more widely across the island.

One of the highlighted solutions to secondary road dilemmas was chip-and-seal technology, a proven road-surfacing method that combines an asphalt binder and aggregate to create a durable surface at a lower cost than traditional paving. The company believes this option could allow for faster upgrades to secondary and residential roads while maximizing the use of public funds.

“These Primex investments represent a long-term commitment to Anguilla,” the company stated. “We are not only expanding our capabilities, but we are positioning the island to better take care of its own infrastructural needs locally.”

Primex Concrete Services has made what it describes as a significant financial investment in repairing the Brimegin-based asphalt plant and acquiring the chip-and-seal equipment, with the goal of strengthening local capacity and reducing reliance on external contractors.

Once operational, Anguilla can pride in both an asphalt plant and chip-and-seal technology available on island – tools that could play a critical role in maintaining and improving the road network in a more sustainable and timely manner. The chip-and- seal option is expected to be ready to roll out within four weeks, after some testing.

The company is now seeking formal support and partnership with the Government of Anguilla, offering road construction and rehabilitation services that address long-standing infrastructure challenges while providing value for money.

According to Primex, the asphalt plant is expected to be fully operational within the next three months, marking what could be a turning point in how road works are delivered locally.

As discussions continue, the initiative has the potential to open a new chapter in public-private collaboration aimed at improving road conditions and the quality of life for residents across Anguilla.

Attackers FC is proud to announce a new chapter in its history through a renewed partnership with long-time player, captain, supporter and former sponsor Mr. Ian “Sugar George” Edwards, founder and managing director of Sugar George Inc and Sunset Homes.
Sugar George who played with the Club through the period 1996 – 2014, played a critical role as he helped the Club win many titles throughout the mentioned period.

Sugar George did whatever it took to keep the Club existence going. He donated his time, coached the Club, sponsored the Club and as a former player, has remained a devoted follower of the team over the years. His enduring passion for football and commitment to community development have inspired him to once again invest in the growth and success of the Club.

With this new sponsorship, the Club will now be officially known as Sugar George Attackers FC.
Speaking on the partnership, Sugar George expressed his enthusiasm: “Football has always been close to my heart, and Attackers FC has played a vital role in shaping the sporting spirit of our community. I am honored to once again be part of this journey and look forward to seeing the team reach new heights.”
Club representatives also welcomed the renewed partnership, noting that Sugar George’s support will provide critical resources for player development, youth programs, and community engagement initiatives.

Attackers FC, now Sugar George Attackers FC, continues to be one of the leading Clubs in local football, known for its discipline, resilience, and deep community roots. The Club looks forward to the upcoming season with optimism and a strengthened sense of pride under its new name.

– Press Release

Anguillian-born technology professional Dexter Gumbs has launched Polliglot AI, an artificial intelligence-powered translation platform designed to help creators, educators, students, businesses and organisations break language barriers and reach global audiences more effectively.

Polliglot AI enables users to upload a video file, select a target language, and receive a translated video with accurate subtitles or translated audio in just a few steps. The platform supports multiple languages including English, French, Spanish, Hindi, Tamil and others, with additional languages being added as the service expands. The name is derived from the word “polyglot,” meaning a person who speaks multiple languages, reflecting the platform’s purpose of enabling communication across language barriers through artificial intelligence and global connectivity.

The platform is web-based and built on Amazon Web Services’ (AWS) infrastructure, ensuring secure storage, encrypted uploads and downloads and fast processing times. The platform also prioritizes user privacy and data protection. To access it, search www.polliglot.ai in a web browser.

A 30-day free trial is available for any of the 4 plans namely the basic, the pro, the enterprise and the pro enterprise. No hidden charges exist and users can test the platform before committing. Every plan includes AI-powered video translation, speech recognition and subtitling, cloud storage via AWS and encrypted uploads and downloads. The company offers multiple subscription tiers designed to support individual users, teams, and enterprise-level needs, with varying features and support options. Persons interested in utilising the services of Polliglot.ai can locate pricing and other information on their website.

Mr. Gumbs, who currently resides in the United States, has more than a decade of experience in information technology, cloud computing and artificial intelligence systems, primarily working with Amazon Web Services (AWS). Over the years, he has been involved in designing and supporting large-scale cloud applications and has operated an online IT training school offering professional certification courses. Mr. Gumbs believes that since Anguilla is labeled as the “home of AI”, we should maximize the label and while his creation is the beginning, he looks forward to helping other Anguillians grow and innovate in the AI realm.

Recently, Mr. Gumbs extended his work to Anguilla by providing artificial intelligence training opportunities to young Anguillians, awarding scholarships to students preparing for internationally recognised AWS certification exams. Several participants successfully completed the programme, marking an early step toward building local technical capacity in AI and cloud technologies.
Mr. Gumbs said the idea for Polliglot AI was driven by the growing demand for multilingual video content and Anguilla’s global recognition as the home of the “.ai” domain.
“Video is now the primary way people communicate online,” Gumbs said. “Polliglot AI allows Anguillians and global users alike to share their stories, businesses, and educational content with the world in multiple languages without needing expensive translation teams.”

From an Anguillian perspective, the launch of Polliglot AI represents a move toward developing practical artificial intelligence products linked to Anguilla rather than relying solely on domain name revenue. Mr. Gumbs has indicated plans to continue expanding AI education initiatives and has outlined future projects in areas such as healthcare technology and autonomous marine systems, with the long-term goal of creating technology-based employment and entrepreneurship opportunities for Anguillians.
“I want young Anguillians to see that artificial intelligence is something they can build, not just something they use,” Mr. Gumbs said. “It’s a real industry that can create jobs and allow people to stay in Anguilla.”

For more information, contact support@polliglot.ai or WhatsApp +1(240) 926-6678.

By: Rhonica Connor

Happy 2026 – to all who can afford to enjoy it! Following the Festive holidays and celebrations to ring in the New Year, it seems some food price frustrations are curiously festering despite relief. A couple of dates from the Old Year may offer more insight if we consider April 2 in the US and August 1 in Anguilla.

April 2 in the US was “Liberation Day” when the president declared new tariffs across the world! Yes, Americans were “freed” from decades of free trade that had given them – and us – globally competitive pricing on our goods primarily imported from their country. [1]

And on August 1, the People of Anguilla were liberated from paying GST on retail, wholesale and restaurant goods and services, and on the “goods” but not the “services” of manufacturers (they were unexpectedly denied full exemption). You know, like having a water or pump truck deliver water or concrete, as if you could buy such goods with a shopping bag and walk home?

Coincidentally, Tax Foundation analysts also reported that “On August 1, tariffs on US goods imports [were] scheduled to increase for more than 80 countries. With about 71 percent of US goods imports already facing President Trump’s minimum tariffs of 10 percent, much of the attention has focused on how tariffs will impact the manufactured goods sector. However, a variety of food imports are also impacted by the tariffs, and these will likely lead to higher food prices for consumers.” [2]

US Tariffs Affecting Anguillian Food Prices?
In fact, Tax Foundation analysts warned last July that tariffs would ripple through US food supply chains – just when GST Relief would begin. They described how a beverage company might switch source countries for aluminum in their cans, but that items like bananas and the flavours of Brazilian coffee could not be produced in the US. That would lead to passing on tariffs without options. [2] While we have regional coffee and our own banana alternatives, the impact is inescapable.

They continued, “In 2024, the US imported about $221 billion in food products, 74 percent of which ($163 billion) faced the Trump tariffs… they will exceed 30 percent for some countries if the reciprocal tariffs go into effect on August 1. The top five exporters of food products to the US, in order, are Mexico, Canada, the EU, Brazil, and China, accounting for 62 percent of total US food imports.” [2]

Tough Timing for Anguillian Consumers – and Leaders
Think about it. US tariffs took effect the same week 13% GST was repealed from goods while replacing duty previously re-named Interim Goods Tax, which we had always paid. Except for one thing: reinstated duty did not apply to food – which was exempted from GST in December 2024.

Thus, 13% savings on all goods, “confectionaries” and other newly exempted food items taxed by the previous government were countered by “10 percent to 30 percent” US tariffs on “food products” at the same time. Some wrongly blamed higher food prices on restoring pre-GST duties, because they were not added to food. Yet others blamed merchants for adding tariff impacts and accused them of gouging. They also created pressure to destroy freedom of commerce from a new law establishing unrestricted powers for business inspections, goods seizures, and fines. [3] Taking rights, as with GST.

By October, Premier Richardson Hodge explained, “We here are experiencing issues from the increases in tariffs that have impacted not just Anguilla, but all of the other countries that import items coming through the US…This is resulting in higher food prices. …as a result of Anguilla’s businesses importing products from the US, we, like other countries are now suffering from high commodity prices due to the recently imposed US tariffs.”[4]

So why are some still saying, “They promised relief, but putting duties back made food more expensive…”? Is it an excuse for those who wanted to keep GST, so customers paid double for their utility taxes? Remember: those taxes were built into prices before GST renamed them! If any, blame must go to US tariffs, not to duties we always paid, and which were not added back to food, regardless.

Growing American – and Global – Grocery Angst…
By November, Americans expressed their pricing pain at the polls. They handed handy wins to Democrats in a handful of off-cycle elections where Republicans had fared much better in the past. That political pressure led Trump to rescind some tariffs, “…in the face of growing angst among American consumers about the high cost of groceries.” [5]

Reuters reported rollbacks on many products that “…have seen double-digit year-over-year price increases. …over 200 items ranging from oranges, acai berries and paprika to cocoa, chemicals used in food production, fertilizers and even communion wafers.” Whereas “ground beef…was nearly 13% more… and steaks cost almost 17% more …” than a year earlier. [5]

And US price pressures persist from immigration policies affecting farm workers to tariffs on imported goods not rolled back in November. Whereas our Statistics Department just reported 1.2% overall inflation here, despite 1.3% lower food prices in the fourth quarter and 6.6% lower than 2024 – but, as US businesses have absorbed a large share of tariffs to date, “items with low profit margins, including groceries, may be among the first to rise” in 2026.[6,7] Thus, as these are averages, some prices may still seem higher, while others inch back to earlier levels due to erratic tariffs that continue.
Meanwhile, on December 30, the British Navy reported Russian attacks on ships in Black Sea ports attempting to load Ukrainian wheat, posing further risks to “global food security” [8].

Cost of Living vs. Lost Liberty
Nearly every household in Anguilla depends on prepared food from time to time, if not daily, to manage getting to work and getting children to school. And those time – and cost – pressures increase whenever anyone needs second or third jobs to pay their bills. Beyond completely removing GST from grocery stores, GST Relief made restaurant and bakery food more affordable, as even the smallest venues were pressured to register and collect it. Can you imagine today’s prices if we were still paying 13% more without relief? This government delivered on their promise.

If only they had promised to restore our civil rights lost under GST. When they replaced it with GST on services, did the technocrats force a compromise for financial relief? They notably retained their powers to oppress businesses left in the services snare – and the rest of us still subjected to lost rights and 26 ways to criminalise commerce. Yes, the General Services Tax Act reduced a few shocking penalties, but it continues to make a farce of the Constitution!

How? In an intimate society our size, intrusive taxation should stop at inspecting boxes at the border, not bank statements – without cause or court orders. For example, the General Services Tax Act exposes every lawyer to arbitrary audits of fees paid for some of the most private matters in our lives. And anyone can be called under oath to give evidence against a merchant – or forced self-incrimination, without a lawyer. Yet, even if liberated from GST, businesses remain at risk of predatory prosecution – in perpetuity. And they may also be forced to undergo audits going back many years, just to be removed from the registry! [9]

So, many food prices may seem higher than ever, now inflated by US tariffs. But. The price of our lost rights and privacy is the highest price we are still forced to pay!

Repeal GST – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_Day_tariffs; [2] https://taxfoundation.org/blog/trump-tariffs-food-prices/; [3] Consumer Protection Policy, Ministry of Finance, Feb 2023; [4] https://theanguillian.com/2025/10/premier-attributes-high-food-prices-to-us-tariffs/
[5] https://www.reuters.com/business/trump-cuts-tariffs-beef-coffee-other-foods-inflation-concerns-mount-2025-11-14/; [6] Anguilla’s Consumer Price Index, 4Q25; [7] https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/03/business/tariffs-prices-2026; [8] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/dec/31/ukraine-war-briefing-attack-on-global-food-security-as-russia-hits-wheat-ships-and-ports; [9] General Services Tax Act, 2025.

Since last Saturday morning (January 3rd, 2026), news networks across the globe have been occupied in reporting on the developing story of Maduro’s “secretive” capture by America’s renowned military might, Delta Force. Though the masses may deem the surgical attack which resulted in the removal of the Venezuelan President, as a violation of international law, it is hoped that in the long run this act of willful aggression would prove to be beneficial to the Venezuelan people.

Notwithstanding, it is rather ironic to realize that even as President Donald Trump had made himself a broker of peace between Hamas and Israel, and even though he has been seeking peace between Russia and Ukraine, and though he claims to be the initiator of peace for eight wars, he, as an apparent international peace icon, has used his power as US Commander- in-Chief to launch a stealthy night-time attack in the bombing of Venezuela, capturing President Nicolas Maduro and his wife under the cover of darkness during Friday night.

“It was dark. The lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to our expertise,” Trump boasted. “It was dark and deadly.”

Yes, it was indeed a dark and deadly kind of stealthy capture. Well orchestrated; well calculated. In fact, one prominent US general reported that this military operation, known as “Operation Absolute Resolve”, had been months in the planning and was well rehearsed. But there is one question that looms among news reporters and legal analysts. It is a question that baffles me, as well. And that is whether the Friday night attack and the capture of Maduro and his wife was a legal act, according to international law and standard diplomatic norms.

One begs to question: how can Trump use his military might to attack a sovereign country without the approval of Congress who is designed to authorize and regulate such military missions in foreign countries. But Secretary of State Marco Rubio is known to say that if Congress was informed beforehand, or if congressional authority was sought as pre-strike protocol, then there would have been a high probability that the carefully crafted mission would have been foiled through a potential leak.

I tend to think that whether or not Congress was apprised of the pending attack, and whether or not it had given its approval, the mission would have been carried out anyway, for the world’s largest American owned aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, along other destroyers carrying heavy military arsenal were not positioned out in Venezuelan waters for months just for nothing. Besides, several ‘barbaric’ airstrikes were made against boats heading north, suspected of transporting cocaine to the US. They were systematically, mercilessly obliterated – an indication that something of a higher magnitude was in the making.

So, most likely, congress’s disapproval would not have deterred President Trump from ordering this carefully-crafted attack. After all, it seems like this US President can do no wrong. He enjoys the privilege of presidential immunity granted him by the Supreme Court anyway, and officers of the Trump administration have expressed that there was a legitimate right for the attack that brought about the capture of Maduro in order to bring him to justice.

Now the Venezuelan President and his wife are being charged in a Manhattan court. He is indicted on charges of working with international drug-trafficking groups for the last two decades, shipping their illicit drug merchandise to the US. She is charged with accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars as bribes related to this narcotics trade. The charges also include narcotics terrorism, and the possession of high powered machine guns and destructive devices poised against the US.

It is common knowledge that President Nicolas Maduro had been a ruthless, repressive dictatorial-style leader of Venezuela – a developing country which was once richened from oil reserves but which has now been reduced to a country of abject poverty where only the affluent and powerful thrive. Many Venezuelans who had opposed Maduro’s rule had been kidnapped and killed by brutish forces loyal to the dictator, and millions of refugees had to flee the economically debased country which still holds the world’s richest crude oil reserves.

And so, while President Trump issued his military orders to attack on the guise that Maduro was destroying the lives of millions of Americans through unfettered cocaine trafficking, it is evident that the President’s real goal was to take advantage of Venezuela’s massive oil reserves to further enrich American oil tycoons like Mobile, Exxon and Chevron.

“As everyone knows the oil business in Venezuela has been a total burst for a long period of time,” Trump said. “But we are going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest in the world, to go in, spend billions of dollars to fix the badly broken oil infrastructure and start making money for the country.”

He insisted that America will be running the country. But to what extent that “running” will involve America’s military might is still left to be seen. With that being said, it is hoped that in the next couple of years we will see the promise of fruits realized from this stealthy attack. And it is expected that within a couple more subsequent years, Venezuela will be prospering from the revived crude oil industry. Yes, it is hoped that the end will justify the means.

And no matter what becomes of Mr. and Mrs. Maduro, it is hoped that Venezuela will see a change of direction – a change for the economic, political and social betterment of the country. If the US really runs Venezuela, as Trump claimed, it is hoped that in the not too distant future we can see a harmonious relationship between the Venezuelan Government and the Americans, where not only the Americans pillage the country’s reserves for its rich moguls, but where Caracas and the Venezuelan people can benefit and grow from strength to strength.

Anguilla’s rich creative spirit took centre stage on Saturday, 13th December 2025, as the 9th Annual National Culture and Arts Awards was held at the Aurora Anguilla Resort. The prestigious evening, also known as The Rock Awards, brought together government officials, cultural practitioners, families, supporters and stakeholders in a momentous celebration of those who have dedicated their lives to preserving, promoting and advancing Anguillian culture and the arts.
The evening’s tone was set by chairperson and reigning Miss Anguilla 2025, Jasmine Ruan, who in her welcome remarks reminded the audience that the awards were rooted in togetherness. “Tonight is really about community. About coming together to enjoy the music, the movement, the art, the stories that make us who we are,” she said. “Whether you’re an artist, a nominee, a supporter, or someone who simply loves our culture, your presence here adds the magic to this moment.”

The National Culture and Arts Awards recognise individuals whose commitment has left an indelible mark on Anguilla’s cultural landscape. Fittingly, recipients are presented with The Rock Award itself — a symbolic and literal piece of Anguilla that embodies the island’s strength, resilience and creativity.
This year, five individuals were honoured across several categories spanning participation, leadership, innovation and lifetime achievement in culture and the arts.

Veteran musician Lanvol ‘Pantha’ Hughes received the Performing Arts Award for Participating in and Promoting Culture and Arts. With a remarkable 34-year journey in music, Hughes began performing at just 16 years old with local bands before founding Pantha Vibes International in 2007. His enduring contribution to Anguillian music has been marked by multiple Road March Champion titles and a steadfast commitment to preserving and promoting the island’s cultural heritage.

Amber Woodley was recognised with the Creative Community Engagement and Collaboration Award for Developing and Leading Culture and Arts. Described as a lifelong student, practitioner and teacher of culture, Woodley is the founding member of the All-Ah-Wee Young Theatre Company and the From Within Dance Company. A former pageant queen and the 2025 chairperson of the Miss Anguilla Pageant Committee, she has represented Anguilla locally, regionally and internationally, both on stage and behind the scenes.
The Innovative Creatives Award was presented to Alexis Ryan, a cultural ambassador and creative visionary whose influence on Anguilla’s performing arts and cultural expression is far-reaching. Ryan’s work spans fashion design, performance, mentorship and pageantry, where he has played a vital role in shaping Anguilla’s presence across the region. His multifaceted contribution continues to expand how Caribbean identity is expressed and celebrated.
Emerging soca artiste Viglef “Viggy” Gumbs received the One to Watch Award, recognising his growing impact on Anguilla’s music scene. Gumbs began his musical journey at the age of 12 in local bands before branching out as a solo artist. His efforts to put Anguilla’s soca music on the map have already borne fruit, with back-to-back Groovy Soca Monarch titles in 2024 and 2025.
The evening’s highest honour, the Cultural and Artistic Lifetime Achievement Award, was bestowed upon Renford Kelsick for decades of dedicated service to Anguilla’s cultural development. Kelsick played an instrumental role in the early organisation and implementation of Anguilla Summer Festival, then known simply as Anguilla’s Carnival. As president of the Lions Club in the 1980s, he helped secure financial support that led to significant improvements at the Landsome Bowl Cultural Centre. His contributions have extended to numerous Summer Festival committees and the hosting of countless cultural shows, with his passion still evident through participation in the Klassique Old Timers Troupe.

Delivering the feature address, Honourable Minister Shellya Rogers-Webster emphasised that culture is far more than entertainment. “Culture is not just a luxury. It is a living art of our nation. It is how we remember who we are, tell our stories and celebrate our differences and build our future together,” she said. Congratulating the awardees, the Minister noted that their work not only preserves tradition but also pushes Anguilla forward creatively and economically. “Culture is also an economic asset… but more than that, culture is our social capital. It strengthens community ties, heals wounds and offers young people pathways to self-expression and progress.”

Chair of the Selection Committee, Jacqueline Bryan, provided insight into the rigorous nomination and evaluation process, grounding her remarks in reflections on creativity and courage. Quoting Mahatma Gandhi, she said, “A nation’s culture resides in the hearts and in the souls of its people,” adding that the awards were not simply about accolades, but about affirming the soul of Anguilla. She explained that nominations spanned multiple categories and segments, with each submission carefully reviewed to ensure fairness, integrity and high standards. “After careful discussion, scoring and systematic evaluation, the committee reached a unanimous and harmonious decision,” she shared.

The ceremony was also enriched by cultural performances, including an opening dance by Women of Dance and a stirring saxophone performance by Elliot Gumbs. One of the most poignant moments of the night came when honouree Alexis Ryan delivered a spoken word poem celebrating Anguilla’s people, creativity and pride, describing the island as “the jewel of the Leeward Islands” and its people as “proud… with a level of pride in their country that is bigger than their country.”

Closing remarks were delivered by Avon Carty, who expressed gratitude to the Government of Anguilla and the Ministry of Social Development for their continued support of the cultural sector. Acknowledging the often unseen labour behind such initiatives, she thanked those working tirelessly within the Department of Youth and Culture – particularly its Culture Division – to ensure that Anguilla’s cultural bearers are recognised and celebrated.

As the curtains fell on the 9th Annual National Culture and Arts Awards, it was clear that Anguilla’s culture remains vibrant because of the people who guard it, shape it and pass it on. On this night, those individuals were rightfully honoured — not only for what they have done, but for the legacy they continue to build for generations to come.

Continuing to consider our 1982 constitution – executive powers are conferred by Her (now, His) Majesty to the Governor, Acting Governor and Deputy, Executive Council and Secretary thereto, Chief Minister (now, Premier), and the Attorney General in Chapters II and III. [1] Most of us take most of these formalities and powers for granted and assume accountability for good governance to be among them. That said, some seemingly arbitrary powers merit our awareness instead of our assumptions.

Chapter II: The Governor – Serving at “Majesty’s Pleasure”
Section 19 begins with clarity, saying, “There shall be a Governor of Anguilla, who shall be appointed by Her Majesty and hold office during Her Majesty’s pleasure,” with powers “conferred or imposed on him by this Constitution or any other law and such other powers as Her Majesty may from time to time be pleased to assign to him…but no court shall enquire whether or not he has complied with any such Instructions.”[1] This appears to limit a Governor’s accountability to the monarch, alone.

Acting Governor
Section 20 addressed “any period when the office of Governor is vacant or the Governor is absent from Anguilla [> 48 hours], or is for any other reason unable to perform” whereby the monarch could designate an Acting Governor through the Secretary of State, or that, “the Attorney-General shall, during Her Majesty’s pleasure, act in the office of Governor” once they have taken appropriate oaths, and serve until notified of the Governor’s resumption of duties.[1] One recent example was Paul Candler’s role following Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam’s service and before the arrival of Julia Crouch in 2023.[2]

Governor’s deputy
Before Deputy Governors, Section 21 described how “the Governor…may in his discretion, by writing under his hand, appoint the Attorney-General…” or another “suitable person in Anguilla to be his deputy” to fulfill the duties as Governor until the monarch or the Governor revoke the role at their discretion; “…but no court shall enquire whether or not he has complied with any such instructions.”[1] Really?

Chapter III: The Executive
Section 22 echoes royal powers, but it allowed for delegation in Subsection 2: “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive authority of Anguilla may be exercised on behalf of Her Majesty by the Governor …but nothing in this subsection shall operate so as to prejudice the provisions of any laws … whereby functions are, or may be, conferred on persons or authorities other than the Governor.”[1] Well, except for Sections 27 and 28, to follow.

Section 23 established Executive Council to include the “Chief Minister [now, Premier], not more than three other Ministers and two ex-officio members” naming the AG and PS, Finance ? at that time. [1]

Appointment of Ministers – “Acting in His Discretion”
While the composition of a sitting government has been amended since 1982, it was interesting to see that, “The Governor, acting in his discretion, shall appoint as the Chief Minister the elected member of the Assembly who, in his judgment, is likely to command the support of a majority of the elected members of the Assembly”; and other Ministers would be appointed “in accordance with the advice of the Chief Minister…”[1]

What if, in “his discretion” the Governor wanted to appoint a Minister who was not the leader of the newly elected party? Or can the Governor appoint another Premier even if the incumbent party retained legislative majority? Why decide who is “likely” to be chosen by one’s peers – instead of allowing one’s peers to choose? And could anyone ask the court to debate who is “likely” to have the support of the elected members, since “no court shall enquire” regarding the Governor’s actions? Hmm.

Tenure of office of members
Section 25 enshrined that the Governor must “dissolve the Assembly” and set the date for a new election following a two-thirds “lack of confidence” vote in the Government. After an election [for that, or routine cycles?], the [Premier] “shall vacate his office” if the Governor tells him that he is “about to appoint another person as the Chief Minister.” Other reasons include: ceasing to be a member of the Assembly; not being elected; resignation; or if a court sentences him to “death or to imprisonment (by whatever name called) for a term exceeding twelve months.” [1] They thought of everything!

The Section goes on to state that other Ministers shall also be terminated by the Chief Minister [Premier] or the Governor with advice of the Chief Minister.[1]

Ministerial Duties – and Accountability without Authority?
Section 26 states that the Governor may “authorise any other Minister” to fulfill the [Premier’s] duties if unable to do so from illness or absence – and to revoke that authority “…in his discretion if, in his judgment, it is impracticable to obtain the Chief Minister’s advice owing to his illness or absence,” but otherwise with the [Premier’s] advice.[1]

Section 27 also starts off with the Governor and Premier in consultation to “assign to any Minister responsibility for the conduct (subject to the provisions of this Constitution and of any other law) of any business of the Government of Anguilla including responsibility for the administration of any department of government” – “Provided that a Minister shall not be charged with responsibility under this section for…matters mentioned in subsection (2)(a) and (b) of the next following section.”[1] …(a) “relates to defence, external affairs or internal security, including the police;” and (b)? Ministers are barred from:

28. (2)(b) “…the appointment (including the appointment on promotion or transfer, appointment on contract and appointment to act in an office) of any person to any public office, the suspension, termination of employment, dismissal, or retirement of any public officer or taking of disciplinary action in respect of such an officer, the application to any public officer of the terms or conditions of employment of the public service (including salary scales, allowances, leave, passages or pensions) for which financial provision has been made;”[1] So, is that why “any person in any public office” may not feel accountable to implementing policies for which the People elected Ministers?

…and GST? A Pattern of Discretionary Powers
Maybe the latter section helps explain gaps between the GST Relief implementation for one of the promised sectors failing to receive full relief. But those discretionary powers must have flowed straight from His Majesty through the Governor’s hand when she signed the General Services Tax Act. One public officer holds dominion over GST: from registration; to audits and records confiscation; remittance of overpayments and security deposits; assessments; seeking travel restrictions and court seizures for goods, capital and immovable property; replacement of damaged tax certificates – and more! We are also reminded that, “No criminal proceedings in respect of any offence under this Act shall be commenced except where the Comptroller determines to bring charges and prosecute…[and] where the offence alleged involves the failure to do any act as required under this Act, within 5 years after the Comptroller has become aware of such failure”! [3] Yes, powers so discretionary that they require mind-reading, with exposure to criminal prosecution – forever? Wow.

So. Will Anguilla set new standards for all democracies with this Constitutional review? And… will checks and balances be enshrined where “no court shall enquire” and where new laws oppress us today?

Repeal GST – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1] The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Candler; [3] General Services Act, 2025.

Most of us will know the classic holiday song “I’ll be home for Christmas” which was written for soldiers longing to return home (during the Second World War) and recorded by Bing Crosby in 1943. While it contains elements such as snow and mistletoe that may be unfamiliar to us in the Caribbean, it is extremely popular and has been sung by many artists including the Mighty Sparrow. Unfortunately for some, this Christmas the song’s last line “If only in my dreams” will be their reality. Many friends and family members will however, thankfully, be home for Christmas. Some will be fortunate to be among the first to arrive through the brand-new beautiful terminal building at the Clayton J. Lloyd International Airport. At its opening ceremony last Friday December 12th, one of the honourees, Pieter Carter, spoke of the fateful Christmas Eve 48 years ago when Captain Clayton J. Lloyd lost his life and others perished with him on the aircraft trying to get home for Christmas.

Having experienced the last Christmas (2024) far away from the warmth of home, I truly look forward to being home for Christmas. And I really mean FAR AWAY FROM THE WARMTH. For I was on a fabulous excursion – a 14-day cruise to Antarctica, the most desired but least visited cruise destination in the World – as far South as one can travel unless you have special scientific tasks which permit you to, and, though it was the South Pole’s summer, it was bitterly cold. The visit was awesome in so many respects, but the feeling of being home with family and friends in my lovely island, Anguilla, is unmatched by any other experience.

Christmas at home was a magical experience during my childhood. My earliest recollections were of Five Finger Christmas trees cut down by my Dad from “in the bush” on the Junks Hole estate and erected in our Living Room. These trees, about 10 feet high, would be beautifully decorated with ornaments and lights, as we were fortunate to have a generator to provide electricity long before the mains supply reached our area in 1980. We would regularly be awakened by carollers with their string-band music. On Christmas mornings we would find our gifts under the Christmas Tree. Often, these would include toys for each one of us from our older cousin in the USA, Lincoln Lewis, whom we called Paipy Lindoo. We once got an entire toy band, guitar, wind instruments and drums, that really worked.

We would all go off to early morning church, decked out in our new Christmas clothes, and greet friends and family including those who had come “Home for Christmas” from the Virgin Islands, the USA and other countries around the world. Lunch extended into dinner, we would usually have a huge turkey brought in from St Thomas by one of our aunts, ham, goat and sheep meat, roasted potatoes, potato pudding, peas and rice, and much more. My mother would have baked many cakes, but her specialty was fruit cakes, which were heavenly. She would have had her fruits soaked in wine for many weeks and even the waxed paper between the finished product and the baking pans were fought over.

We would visit with our friends and cousins, and there would be a constant stream of visitors to our house as well. Sometimes dozens of us cousins would set off to pick ‘sherries’ and sea grapes, and somehow always end up in the sea at Junks Hole, Shoal Bay or Island Harbour. There would be Christmas concerts at school and at church which would always be well attended and show off the great natural talents of our young singers and actors.

Our toys in those days were mainly cowboy guns with paper shots for the boys, and dolls for the girls. We had squibs and sparklers which we would light, especially at night. Another fixture at nights was roast corn on the coal pot outside, with story telling as we waited for our next delicious roasted corn. The Christmas celebrations would go over into Boxing Day, when we would have a huge family picnic at Captain’s Bay. Our Christmas Tree would be kept in place until the 12 Days of Christmas were over, and we would have a huge bonfire afterward. One thing I regret in retrospect is that we didn’t save some of those magnificent specimens which we could spray green and reuse year after year. Because I doubt we will ever see their like again, and artificial trees are poor replacements for the Five Finger trees.

As I grew older the outside world began to beckon, indeed travel is now one of my favourite pursuits. My Aunt Mena lived in Aruba where she had worked for many years with the Lago Oil Company, and each of us children would go to visit her just before turning 12 when adult fares would apply. As my birthday is in January, I was fortunate to spend my first Christmas away in Aruba, which I enjoyed thoroughly. My next Christmas away from home was in Antigua two years later (1975) at the home of my Aunt Ursula and her husband whom I called Teacher Max, during his service as a SDA Pastor there. This time, the house was filled with youngsters around my age and we had an awesome time, window-shopping in St. Johns at night, getting into trouble, doing what young men do. A highlight was attending Midnight Mass at the St. John’s Cathedral where the choir’s rendition of the Hallelujah Chorus from Handel’s “Messiah” was surely one of the most memorable performances I have ever witnessed!

In the years following, I completed my studies at the Valley Secondary School (now the Albena Lake-Hodge Comprehensive School) and began studies at the St. Lucia A’ level College (now the Sir Arthur Lewis Community College). I always looked forward to coming home for every school vacation, which involved flying back and forth island-hopping on LIAT. As LIAT was headquartered in Antigua, I would always spend a few days there with my family coming home or on my way back to St. Lucia. This was the case in December 1977. For some reason I spent more time than usual in Antigua before heading to St Maarten on LIAT on December 24th, Christmas Eve, that fateful day that Pieter Carter had spoken of. I was standing at the desk of Valley Air Service at Princess Juliana International Airport waiting for my flight to Anguilla on that airline when Mr. Jeremiah Gumbs, who was a family friend, walked up to me and said, “Young man, what are you doing here?” I told him I was waiting for the plane to Anguilla. Captain Clayton Lloyd had been trying to help all who needed to get home for Christmas so my flight was delayed. Mr. Gumbs shouted, “Let’s go to Rendezvous!” He would have been there perhaps to meet guests at his hotel, Rendezvous Bay Hotel, and take them by his speedboat directly to Rendezvous Bay. I grabbed my suitcase and Naaman and Oniel Webster, the crew, took us quickly to Anguilla. They then drove me in their car towards Island Harbour (where they live), dropping me off at the top of the road a short distance from our house. A few minutes later I was seated in the Living Room watching St. Maarten TV, one of the only TV channels available at that time. Suddenly, the teleprinter flashed the chilling news that a Valley Air Service plane had crashed shortly after take-off and all aboard were feared dead. The very plane I was supposed to be on, flown by legendary Anguillian aviation pioneer Clayton J Lloyd, save for the intervention of God through Lloyd’s uncle, Jeremiah Gumbs! I could only sit there and tremble for what must have been a half-hour or so until I composed myself enough to go into the kitchen and tell my mother what had happened. Yes, I was home for Christmas, but under incredible circumstances that I will never forget. “Home for Christmas” will always have a special meaning for me. In fact, apart from last year, I can only recall spending one Christmas away from home since then.

This week, the first passengers will enter Anguilla through the brand-new terminal building at our airport which proudly bears the name Clayton J Lloyd International Airport, honouring Captain Lloyd who lost his life as he had lived it, serving his island and its people. Some of them will be coming home for Christmas. And many others will arrive at the Blowing Point Ferry Terminal to be home for Christmas, and take the Jeremiah Gumbs Highway out of Blowing Point, named after another legendary Anguillian pioneer and nation-builder. The question is, what is “Home for Christmas” like today, in 2025?

It is undeniable that Christmas in Anguilla has changed much over the past 50 years. We now have island-wide electricity, so there are lots more Christmas lights in homes and businesses. We can now fly home non-stop from several cities in the USA. We can call our family and friends all over the world on our cell phones which didn’t exist when I was younger. We can now buy all the turkey and ham that we wish right here in our stores. We can listen to Christmas carols and other songs on our phones and other devices. We can shop on our devices for whatever we desire. We have vehicles that we can drive to visit friends and families on paved roads, unlike the dusty unpaved roads which we used to have to walk or catch a ride on in the past. We have many more churches, many of them air-conditioned and more comfortable and better equipped than those in the decades past. But we seldom hear carollers anymore. Now the guns on the streets are no longer toys. Now, we seldom see the visiting friends and family because everyone has his or her own agenda and our schedules can’t seem to permit the picnics, church services or other get-togethers of the past.

It is my prayer that Christmas at Home will be a time of peace and joy, a time of refreshing of the spirit of togetherness, of sharing and of caring. If you are Home for Christmas, please take some time to reflect on the real meaning of Christmas, the real Reason for the Season. Whether you live here or you are visiting, let us all try to bring back some of the elements that used to make being home for Christmas so very wonderful. And let us thank God that we have the wonderful privilege to indeed be in this blessed and beautiful island with family and friends for Christmas 2025.

Shockwaves rippled across Anguilla on December 10, 2024, as news of the sudden passing of Vernon Leroy Gumbs spread throughout the island. Known affectionately as “Leroy,” he was a devoted Christian, a respected community figure, and the visionary founder of one of Anguilla’s leading construction firms.

Leeward Construction Co. Ltd, under his leadership, helped shape the physical landscape of Anguilla. Among its many accomplishments are some of the island’s most notable infrastructure projects, including the new Blowing Point Ferry Terminal, the airport cargo building, and the stage facility at the Landsome Bowl Cultural Centre.

With his unexpected passing came a wave of sorrow—and an inevitable question: What would become of the company he built, especially with critical projects already underway?

A hallmark of great leadership is preparing for continuity, and in this regard, Mr. Gumbs ensured that his legacy would endure. Leeward Construction was never left to chance. Instead, it remains not only operational but moving forward with purpose and stability.

For nearly 40 years, Mr. Gumbs ran the company alongside his wife and co-founder, Mrs. Denease Gumbs. Over the past year, she has continued to guide the organization with strength and vision, now joined by their son and newly appointed Managing Director, Denroy V. Gumbs.

Denroy is no stranger to the company’s inner workings. Having spent years working alongside his parents across various departments and construction seasons, he has long been deeply involved in the day-to-day management and strategic operations of the firm. His transition into leadership reflects both preparation and promise.

Together, Mrs. Gumbs and Denroy are carrying forward the Leeward Construction legacy, supported by a dedicated leadership team, including lead foreman and emerging contractor, Ruvin Richardson, who was groomed by Mr. Gumbs for over fifteen years. The company’s supervisors, field workers, and administrative staff continue to uphold the standards and reputation that have defined the Leeward Construction brand for decades.

Even as the organization navigates the natural uncertainty and grief that follow such a profound loss, its work presses on. Current efforts include multiple active projects and the ongoing construction of the Patience Gumbs Road—known locally as the South Hill Road.

In every task and every finished structure, the team honors the memory of Vernon Leroy Gumbs. Leeward Construction Co. Ltd remains steadfast in delivering what he championed throughout his life: “Quality and Speed”.

The new directors of Leeward Construction have created the Leroy Gumbs: Leeward Legacy Educational Grant. This grant will empower aspiring construction professionals ages 18-35 to provide financial assistance in achieving their career goals. The need to fund interested persons address the growing demand for skilled talent in the construction industry.

This fund will provide financial assistance to persons who are interested in pursuing tertiary education in areas of general construction, interior and exterior design, architecture and engineering. Persons desiring a trade certificate are also eligible.

We are therefore seeking your assistance and partnership in meeting this need. No contribution is too small. You can deposit your gift to any one of the accounts listed at Liberty Co-operative Credit Union or make a direct transfer.

USD ACCOUNT#14965-17
ECD ACCOUNT#14965-07

Thank you for your kind consideration and being a part of this endeavour. We are eternally grateful.

Under the soft evening lights of Ani Art Academy, Anguilla’s creative community came together on Sunday, 7th December 2025 for a powerful fusion of art and advocacy. The “Draw the Line Against Gender-Based Violence Exhibition and Competition” — a collaboration between the Gender Affairs Unit, the Department of Youth and Culture through Malliouhana Fest 2025, and Ani Art Academy – unfolded as one of the island’s most stirring events held during the global 16 Days of Activism campaign, observed annually from 25 November to 10 December.

The tagline –“Art that Speaks. Art that Heals. Art that Transforms.” – echoed throughout the gallery, carried by artworks that spoke boldly of pain, resilience, and the urgent need for cultural transformation.
The competition invited artists aged 15 and over to interpret how Anguilla can shift from silence and injustice to respect, accountability, and care. Entries spanned Fine Art and Mixed Media and Installations — each category judged on creativity, relevance to the theme, technical skill, and emotional impact.
Dean of Ani Art Academy, Taffari Crawford, expressed pride in hosting the exhibition. “I am elated to present, along with the DYC, the Art Arise competition,” he said. “We have some really nice pieces of a diverse range. Hopefully, this will inspire more people to participate next year.” Despite modest participant numbers, the works were strikingly personal. Many artists used the platform to express lived experiences or explore aspects of gender-based violence often overlooked.
Competitor, Lancer Lloyd, presented “Comminuted Hope”, a piece shaped by the devastating ripple effects of gun violence. “My inspiration… was partly the violence that happens in Anguilla, gun violence and gun crime in general,” Lloyd explained. “It has a lasting effect on all of the lives of children in the home, wives in the home… the silent sufferers. I wanted to depict the stark realities of what we can miss because of gun violence.”

Her piece features three bone-like shards shattered by a bullet, each representing family, romantic life, and peace of mind — fragile elements of life that violence can fracture instantly. Despite not being Anguillian, Lloyd noted that living here had made the island’s struggles “imprint” on her deeply.
Adrian Royal, whose painting “Silent Chains” portrays a woman in visible pain yet determined resistance, revealed the deeply personal story behind his work. “It is based on my mother’s story. We were sadly victims of abuse by my father. Thank God, we overcame it,” he said. The open eyes of the painting’s subject symbolise perseverance. “She still keeps standing up… She still has faith that she can get free.”
Royal’s technique blended watercolour and acrylics, using soft washes to create smoke-like shadowing—a visual representation of emotional suffocation gradually breaking apart.
Navene Mairyshaw presented “The Perfect Prize”, an acrylic work exploring a seldom-highlighted dimension of gender-based violence: abuse of men. “When we think about gender-based violence, we think about females… but men also go through the same things,” she said. Her painting depicts a man trapped within a relationship that appears functional from the outside but is emotionally destructive within. “He can’t speak, he can’t share his heart… he can’t be himself.”
Her daughter, Eiolani Mairyshaw, also competed, unexpectedly following her mother into the event. Eiolani’s piece, “Control” was a mixed-media artwork featuring a mouse constricted by a coiled snake. “The mouse represents the individual whose vulnerability is exposed,” she explained. The snake symbolises coercive control. Using origami, paint and mod podge, she crafted a symbolic scene of suffocation. “I like to do freeform things like origami… that’s why I decided to put it into a piece.”
Additional pieces on display added further depth to the exhibition’s emotional landscape, including “Withered Flowers” by Johandri Perez Ventura, a work that evoked a haunting sense of fragility, forced silence, and loss. Anna Lynch’s “Support System” also drew significant attention: a striking installation featuring a wedding dress crafted from coffee filters, gauze, and bandages. The unconventional materials symbolised the delicate balance between hope and despair, capturing the complex reality of how a woman with a history of abuse can still move toward healing and discover healthy love in its aftermath.
Her Excellency the Governor, Julia Crouch, attended the exhibition and assisted in presenting the awards following deliberations by the judging panel.
The winners were announced to warm applause, with the Fine Art/Mixed Media category seeing first place awarded to Lancer Lloyd, who received EC$1,200, followed by Meridith Gumbs in second place with EC$1,000 and the added distinction of winning the People’s Choice Award, while third place went to Navene Mairyshaw, who received EC$800. In the Installations/Creative Concepts category, Eiolani Mairyshaw secured first place with a prize of EC$1,200 and also captured the People’s Choice Award, while second place was earned by Anna Lynch, who received EC$1,000.
All artists also received participation certificates, underscoring the event’s commitment not only to recognition but to community encouragement and growth.
Beyond the prizes, the evening at Ani Art Academy achieved something more profound: it provided a platform for truth-telling, courage, vulnerability, and community reflection. The voices shared — through both paint, sculpture and more — reminded attendees that activism is not only protest; it is also expression, connection, and willingness to confront uncomfortable truths.

By Janissa Fleming

On the evening of Sunday December 7th 2025, on the beach front, just north of Elvis Restaurant and Bar in Sandy Ground, Avenella K. Griffith introduced to the public her second and newest book in the series Sandy Ground Tales. This new edition, entitled “Fishermen”, portrays a collection of fisher-folk stories indicative of the way of life that historically characterized the quaint sea-fearing village of Sandy Ground – the locality of Anguilla’s commercial seaport.
Through “Fishermen” Avenella relates the experiences of two outstanding Sandy Ground fishermen, namely Edwin “Ed” Carty and Aristo Richardson, as well as – to a lesser extent – Sam Webster, from the eastern fishing village of Island Harbour. And, by virtue of her admiration for the culture on which the sea-loving villagers thrive, Avenella pays tribute to all fisher-folk of Anguilla who are known for providing sustenance from the sea for their families, friends or free enterprise.
At the beginning of the ceremony, Pastor Lesley Richardson, Avenella’s pastor, offered a prayer of thanksgiving for the writing talents of the author. The playing of the National Song was then rendered by renowned saxophonist, Elliot Gumbs.
Moderator of the Ceremony was KCN-TV’s personality, Rosanna Browne, who gave some sterling commentary on “Fishermen”, and applauded Avenella for the fine quality of her new production: “Through these stories, Avenella gently reminds us of her resilience, humility, courage and community spirit – qualities that have always anchored the people of Sandy Ground,” Ms. Browne noted. “In ‘Fishermen’, her work also adds historical meaning, capturing a way of life that is both timeless and evolving, ensuring that future generations could come to know and appreciate the people who cast their nets, not only into the sea for a catch, but into the heart of this island’s cultural identity,” she added.
Congratulatory remarks also came from Ms. Susan Hodge, the Secretary of the Anguilla Fisher-folk Association: “On behalf of the Anguilla Fisher-folk Association, I want to recognize and sincerely thank Avenella for capturing these stories. If we do not write our own stories,” she opined, “someone else will write them for us, and we may no longer be the heroes of our stories.”
The Department of Youth and Culture was instrumental in the publishing of “Fishermen”. Its Director, Avon Carty, also conveyed congratulatory commentary: “Today, I am honoured and excited to be able to bring remarks and congratulations on behalf of my Permanent Secretary, Dr. Bonnie Richardson-Lake, and my team at the Department of Youth and Culture.”
“We have a small budget,” she acknowledged, “but it is still enough to help our local authors write our stories. We want to make sure that when our children read, they are not only reading about ‘windy willows and rivers’ that we can’t relate to, but it is important for our children to read our own stories. Avenella has given us this opportunity, as a people, to have our own stories written in our own voices,” Ms. Carty claimed.
Also on hand for the launch was Pastor Phillip Gumbs of the Church of God (Holiness) who is a close acquaintance and affiliate of Avenella. He was chosen to present a snippet of the first story from the pages of “Fishermen”, which was a horrific tale of one dreadful day when a few of Sandy Ground’s fishermen chanced to ply in the waters called The North, where other fishermen before them had feared to tread.
To Sandy Ground’s fishermen, The North had presented itself as a kind of invincible Goliath, and on one particular morning in the 1960s, three brave fish-hunters took on the challenge to venture out in The North – in the ominous waters of the Atlantic. But when they failed to return home within a reasonable timeframe, the entire Sandy Ground community got worried and feared The North had devoured them. Sadly, the three had never returned.
So, Pastor Gumbs read: “The North seemingly besieged the Sandy Ground fishermen and filled their hearts with fear. Like Goliath he defied them as if to challenge ‘Ah yuh come out here, if ah yuh so bad!’ His challenge seemed valid, until early one morning, Ed, that one fearless Sandy Ground fisherman, arose to take on the dreaded North. Five hours later, there were great shouts and applause across the village to welcome Ed and his two fellow fishers back into The Bay. Like David, with one throw, Ed had knocked out Goliath cold, cold and chopped off his head…”
Mrs. Rita Celestine Carty, one of Anguilla’s more prolific writers, was designated to present a review of the book.
“Ladies and gentlemen, the second book in the Sandy Ground Tales series is here,” she said. “Avenella K. Griffith has brought out ‘Fishermen’, highlighting the inspiring fishing exploits of Messrs Ed Carty and Aristo Richardson. We know them well, and we love them deeply. But this knowledge and this affection are now lifted to a higher level…We had her book ‘Boatmen’, and once again in ‘Fishermen’, Avenella K. Griffith ensures that stories of Anguilla and its incredible people are indelibly recorded…”
“In this collection of stories,” Mrs. Carty observed, “Avenella reveals the authenticity and rhythm of the language and the idiom. In the first story, the “jargon or fishing lingo tantalizes our ears even when we are not sure of the meaning of her terms like coble boats; sweeps; live-well; frilling the boat; and transom. The themes highlight in true old-fashion the Anguillian traditions of working hard to own your own and looking out for your own…”
Then, in presenting her extensive address, Avenella stated in part: “Thanks to God for Sandy Ground. Here is where I grew up, and I think it is the best. I thank God for depositing in me the privilege to write, so that in generations to come our young ones can read Sandy Ground Tales.”
“This village has hundreds of stories,” she said, “and I give God thanks for allowing me to publish “Fishermen”, the second one in the series, after ‘Boatmen’ which was published back in 2021.” After elaborating much on the journey which brought her to this destination, Avenella voiced her sincere honour and gratitude to all who assisted her in the project in one way or another.
She thanked all of her friends and associates who had helped to make the book become a reality, and she expressed her appreciation to all those who had contributed behind the scenes to make the launch of “Fishermen” such a success, as well as to all who had come out on the Sunday evening to show their support.
Avenella delightfully presented complimentary copies of “Fishermen” in respect of three individual fishermen, who had played an indispensible role in providing her with information for the creation of the book. These included the renowned sea-fearing stalwarts, Ed Carty and Aristo Richardson, as well as William “Uncle” Connor (deceased) whose book was accepted by his caregiver, Marzena Connor, on behalf of his son, Keith in Australia.
A prayer of blessing on the book was offered by Pastor Lindsey Richardson. At the end of the ceremony, several persons went forward to purchase a copy, as well as to patronize the author herself who had creatively made provision for the sale of Anguilla’s “roas fish on de wire”; fried fish; bar-b-qued fish; fish cakes, fried cakes; “roas corn”; johnny cakes; and good “ole-fashioned sugar ‘n water” – familiar delicacies from Anguillian culture.

By: James R. Harrigan

Did you know that the first Chapter of our 1982 constitution – after many exceptions to “freedoms” – concludes by describing how civil rights may be suspended in a state of public emergency? Here goes…

Section 14: Derogations from fundamental rights and freedoms under emergency powers
This Section asserts, “Nothing contained in or done under the authority of any law shall be held to be inconsistent with or in contravention of section 3 or section 13 of this Constitution to the extent that the law authorises the taking during any period of public emergency of measures that are reasonably justifiable for dealing with the situation that exists in Anguilla during that period.” [1] That’s it.

Section 15: Protection of persons detained under emergency laws – Protection??
In a “public emergency” and with only “reasonable” criteria, we all risk imprisonment without recourse.

It states, “When a person is detained by virtue of any such law as is referred to in section 14 of this Constitution the following provisions shall apply, that is to say—he shall, as soon as reasonably practicable and in any case not more than four days after the commencement of his detention, be furnished with a statement in writing in a language that he understands specifying in detail the grounds upon which he is detained; not more than fourteen days after the commencement of his detention, a notification shall be published in the Official Gazette stating that he has been detained and giving particulars of the provision of law under which his detention is authorised; not more than one month after the commencement of his detention and thereafter during his detention at intervals of not more than six months, his case shall be reviewed by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law … he shall be afforded reasonable facilities to consult a legal representative of his own choice who shall be permitted to make representations to the tribunal appointed for the review of the case of the detained person; and at the hearing of his case … he shall be permitted to appear in person or by a legal representative of his own choice.”[1]

But wait. Subsection (2) continues, “On any review by a tribunal in pursuance of this section of the case of a detained person, the tribunal may make recommendations concerning the necessity or expediency of continuing his detention to the authority by which it was ordered but, unless it is otherwise provided by law, that authority shall not be obliged to act in accordance with any such recommendations.”[1]

And a potentially innocent person without means to pay for a lawyer could be left in prison… for life? The Section concludes, “(3) Nothing contained in subsection (1)(d) or subsection (1)(e) of this section shall be construed as entitling a person to legal representation at public expense.” [1]

Section 16: Enforcement of protective provisions
Next, Section 16 asserts that anyone who thinks their rights have been denied as enshrined in “…sections 2 to 15 (inclusive) of this Constitution…(or, … if any other person alleges such a contravention in relation to the detained person), then…that person may apply to the High Court for redress.” [1]But such “protection” is without meaning for anyone without means.
This section continues, “The High Court shall have original jurisdiction” over claims to such rights, but “…Provided that the High Court may decline to exercise its powers under this subsection if it is satisfied that adequate means of redress for the contravention alleged are or have been available to the person concerned under any other law.” Good luck with redress without resources. And “any court (other than the Court of Appeal, the High Court or a court martial)” may “…refer the question to the High Court unless, in his opinion, the raising of the question is merely frivolous or vexatious.” [1] Subsections 4 to 6 then describe escalation to the Legislature and the Chief Justice. Really? With such alarming rules for detention during a public emergency, the committee should “decline” to retain Sections 15 and 16, full stop. We deserve the same rights and due process as given to anyone arrested at any time, all the time.

Section 17: Declaration of emergency
Section 17 says, “The Governor may, by Proclamation… in the Official Gazette, declare that a state of emergency exists for the purposes of this Chapter.” [1] The Governor may revoke the state of emergency in the same manner, but without further declaration, it would expire in 90 days. Detained? Good luck.

Section 18: Interpretation and savings
The final Section defines various terms, including citizenship, which was amended in 2019. The public emergency definition includes the UK being at war. Let us pray that NATO won’t go to war with Venezuela to help its largest member.

…and GST? More Laws Leaving the People in Purgatory

While the General Services Tax Act exposes us to 26 imprisonment penalties, they are specified from 3 months to 2 years without such infinite discretion. Whereas excess “input tax” is carried for 3 tax periods before allowing claims. Two months hence – or 10 days after an audit “if later” – the refund must offset any other taxes before proceeding (=5 months). But, if the “Comptroller fails to pay a refund of tax relating to an excess” it attracts 1% interest per month, until the refund is made.[2] The refund may as well be detained in a state of emergency.

Part 10 gives 90 days to object (=8 months), and the Comptroller has 90 more to consider it (=11 months). If the claim “succeeds” – the refund is due in 30 days (=1 year) – but, if “not refunded before the expiry of 30 days…” it accrues interest without limit. Note: if objecting to a GST assessment, 50% of the disputed amount must be paid, followed by 90 days for consideration.[2]

These times add up to 12 months from excess tax payment – while the Comptroller has the option to merely accrue 1% simple monthly interest. But, an appeal is allowed at 15 months, and the Comptroller has 90 days to object or be presumed to do so. If the Appeals Tribunal awards a refund, it would accrue interest after 30 days if not paid, approaching 19 months. But within 90 days thereafter, it may be appealed to the High Court. With an unknown length of review, if the Court awards a refund as the matter continues over 2 years, it would again merely accrue interest after 30 days if still not paid! [2]

Remember, one requires means for such rights to be meaningful. Section 42 is clear: “The burden of proving that an assessment is excessive or that a decision of the Comptroller is wrong is on the person objecting to the assessment or decision.” [2] How many legal bills (plus 13% GST!) would be more than the refund in question to “succeed” in getting what is rightfully owed? If ever.

Protections vs. Purgatory?
The public emergency sections about Constitutional “freedoms” and “protections” are appalling. They describe how an innocent person mistakenly detained in such circumstances could languish indefinitely. And…The General Services Tax Act vests powers to legally withhold excess tax payments – indefinitely!

Making the People plead for review or consideration reflects a pattern of disrespect, whether trapped in prison, or capriciously withholding capital while merely accruing interest, putting business liquidity, jobs, and the stability of the tax base at risk. We must stop electing leaders who pass such oppressive laws and fail to replace false “freedoms” with real rights, year after year.

So. Will Anguilla set new global standards for all democracies with this Constitutional review? And… Will our revised constitution have real “protections” from indefinite detention and funds retention in laws like the General Services Tax (GST) Act, even as they reflect “legal” overreach, right now?

Repeal GST – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1] The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] General Services Act, 2025.

The Anglican community came together in a full sanctuary on the evening of December 2nd 2025, to honor the Rt. Rev. L. Errol Brooks on the momentous occasion of his 50th anniversary in the priesthood. Parishioners and visitors filled the church in a warm and heartfelt celebration of a man whose life has been marked by steady devotion, pastoral care, and faithful leadership.
The sermon was delivered by Rev. Canon Dr. Kortright Davis, longtime friend and clerical associate of Rt. Rev Brooks. Canon Davis opened his message with a nostalgic reflection on his schooldays, recalling geography lessons that taught of the highest elevations throughout the Caribbean including his homeland of Antigua and Crocus Hill, Anguilla. He noted that over the years the elevations listed for Anguilla have shifted up and down through various conversions in the metric system- suggesting that, for the sake of consistency, someone else needed to come along and measure again.
Throughout the sermon, he interjected humorous observations that engaged the congregation and added warmth to his reflections. Canon Davis shared that he had known Bishop Brooks from his early days in ministry, consistently recognising him as a faithful steward of God’s work. He also acknowledged the steadfast support of Bishop Brooks’ wife, Rosena, and their son, Crispin, whose presence and partnership have helped shape his ministry over the decades.
Canon Davis went on to outline what he termed the

“Four Ds” that can hinder a community: Despair, Darkness, Dryness, Deception, and Divisiveness. He urged the congregation to remain vigilant against these forces, emphasising that faith, unity, and spiritual awareness are essential to the health of any community.
In a memorable analogy, Canon Davis drew on modern technology to illustrate God’s constant provision. Just as advancements in 5G technology promise faster streaming and improved service, he said, God offers a spiritual 5G network that never fails. These divine gifts—Grace, Growth, Generosity, Goodness, and Gratitude—are always accessible and require no elevation. God’s presence, he reminded the audience, is ever-present and ever-reliable.
Canon Davis closed his sermon with an invitation for all present to seek God—in their circumstances, in one another, and in the ongoing ministry of leaders like Bishop Brooks, whose 50 years of service stand as a testament to faithfulness and perseverance.
It was an evening of warm fellowship, and a deep sense of appreciation for Bishop Brooks and his five decades of dedicated priestly service. His ministry, shaped by humility and strengthened by faith, continues to inspire the community.