There are burdens in Anguilla that cannot be measured by bank accounts, electricity bills, or the price of groceries. They do not show up in headlines or parliamentary debate. Yet they are carried quietly every day inside homes, churches and ordinary conversations that end with “I’m good” even when the truth is far more complicated. Emotional strongholds, those unseen weights of guilt, fear, shame, worry, and unforgiveness, remain some of the most powerful forces shaping how people live, love, and hope.

The theme emerged with striking clarity during reflections inspired by a presentation at the 13th Biennial Conference of the Anglican Church Women Association, where Dr. Michelle Queeley challenged listeners to think about prison in a different way. Not the kind with concrete walls and iron bars, but the kind people carry in their minds. Her message lingered beyond the conference setting because it spoke directly to something deeply familiar in life – the habit of appearing strong even when hurting.

She began with a simple question: have you ever visited someone in prison and how did it feel? The answers were immediate and emotional – sad, heavy, overwhelming. Everyone understood that kind of confinement. But the deeper question followed quietly: what about the prisons no one can see? The ones built from regret, rejection, disappointment, or fear of tomorrow. Where resilience is almost a cultural expectation, those invisible cells are easy to hide behind politeness, laughter, and Sunday morning clothes.

The uncomfortable truth is that many people are walking around free in body but bound in spirit. They go to sleep with the same thoughts that trouble them all day and wake up carrying them again, performing strength for the world while privately feeling stuck. Silence makes the struggle heavier. When pain has no language, healing has no doorway. And when entire communities learn to hide hurt, misunderstanding quietly replaces compassion.

Part of the difficulty is recognising what emotional strongholds really are. They are not just bad days or passing moods. They are patterns – ways of thinking and feeling that settle in so deeply they begin to feel normal. A voice that keeps replaying old mistakes. A constant expectation that something will go wrong. A refusal to release past hurt because letting go feels like losing justice. Over time, these patterns shape decisions, relationships, and even dreams. Freedom becomes harder to imagine, not because it is impossible, but because captivity has become familiar.

Across generations, the same inner battles repeat themselves. Guilt whispers that you should be further along in life. Worry steals sleep with problems that have not even happened. Unforgiveness keeps old wounds fresh, as though time never moved. Shame tells people their past has cancelled their future. None of these voices shout, yet all of them influence how a person walks through the world, what risks they take, what love they accept, what future they believe they deserve.

These strongholds rarely appear without reason. They often grow out of real pain – harsh words spoken in childhood, relationships that broke trust, opportunities that disappeared, grief that never fully healed. Experiences become thoughts, thoughts become beliefs, and beliefs begin steering the direction of a life. When fear or falsehood sits in the driver’s seat, the journey bends accordingly. That is why emotional and spiritual wellbeing can never be separated from the renewal of the mind.

Renewal sounds simple, but it is deeply intentional work. It asks a person to challenge the stories they have believed for years and replace them with something truer, something kinder, something rooted in faith rather than failure. It does not pretend pain never happened. Instead, it dares to ask whether pain might still produce wisdom, strength, or purpose. The question slowly changes from “Why me?” to “What now?” – and that shift, small as it seems, can open space for healing.

But healing has never been meant to happen alone. Caribbean life is built on community – family members who show up unasked, church sisters who pray without being told the full story, neighbours who notice when something feels off. There is quiet power in that togetherness. Sometimes freedom begins not with a grand breakthrough, but with someone sitting beside you long enough for honesty to feel safe. Strength is often remembered in the presence of another person who refuses to let you forget it.

Perhaps the most hopeful image to emerge from this reflection is the idea that the prison door is already open. Not that suffering is imaginary, but that release is closer than it feels. Freedom may begin with a difficult conversation, an apology offered, counselling accepted, or truth finally spoken aloud. Small steps, almost invisible at first. Yet every step weakens the walls that once felt permanent.

People are becoming more willing to talk about mental health, trauma, and emotional resilience, though stigma still lingers in quiet corners. The growing openness matters. A healthier nation is not built only through roads, policies, or economic plans, but through people who are emotionally whole enough to love well, lead wisely, and hope again.

Freedom, then, is rarely dramatic. More often, it is gentle and stubborn – arriving in moments of honesty, forgiveness, faith, and community. And as more people find the courage to walk out of their invisible prisons, the island itself becomes lighter. Not perfect, not pain-free, but freer in the ways that matter most.

Chapter IV of our 1982 Anguilla Constitution Order established the House of Assembly with respect to membership and structure in its initial sections. These are followed by a similar framework for the voters who elect our House members. Yet again, the Constitution presents the absurdity of keys left in the locks, whereby voting rules may be changed by any future laws. [1]

Qualification of voters
Section 43 enumerates qualifications to vote with respect to age [18; whereas the candidates must be at least 21], citizenship [Anguillian – or Commonwealth?], residency [Anguilla] and registration [voter initiated if qualified]:
“Subject to the next following subsection a person shall be qualified to be registered as a voter in an electoral district [and the single electoral district, 2019] if he is of the age of eighteen [18] years and upwards and—is [an Anguillian, 2019], and is domiciled there at the qualifying date; or…who has resided in Anguilla for a period of not less than twelve [12] months immediately before the qualifying date, and is domiciled there at that date, and is the lawful spouse, widow or widower, or the son or daughter or the spouse of such son or daughter of a person who was born in Anguilla; or is a Commonwealth citizen domiciled in Anguilla and has resided there for a period of at least five [5] years immediately before the qualifying date; and is at the qualifying date resident in the electoral district in which he claims to be registered [and]… entitled to be so registered provided that a person shall not be registered as a voter in more than one electoral district.”[1,2]

Disqualification of voters
Section 44 then echoes the disqualifying constraints for members of the House for voters, including:
“…[being] under sentence of death imposed on him by a court in any [country, 1990], or is under a sentence of imprisonment (by whatever name called) exceeding twelve months imposed on him by such a court or substituted by competent authority for some other sentence imposed on him by such a court [and if the offense would also be such in Anguilla, 1990]…[or] certified to be insane or otherwise adjudged to be of unsound mind under any law in force in Anguilla; or is disqualified for registration as a voter by any law in force in Anguilla relating to offences connected with elections.”[1,3]
Subsection 2 continues, “For the purposes of …the preceding subsection—two or more terms of imprisonment that are required to be served consecutively shall be regarded as a single term… for the aggregate period of those terms; and no account shall be taken of a sentence of imprisonment imposed as an alternative to, or in default of the payment of, a fine.” [1] This holds the voters to the same standards as the members.

Right to vote at elections
Section 45 ensures the right to vote, if registered in a geographic [and the single electoral, 2019] district… Well, “unless he is prohibited from so voting by any law in force in Anguilla—because he is a returning officer; or because he has been concerned in any offence connected with elections.” [1,2]
Further, “No person shall vote at any election for any electoral district who—is not registered as a voter in that district; has voted in another electoral district at the same election; is in lawful custody; or is for any other reason unable to attend to vote in person (except in so far as it may be provided by law that persons unable so to attend may vote).” [1] Hmm. Would some want to turn that key if such a future law could enfranchise those “unable to attend to vote in person” due to business, education or medical care – and the entire diaspora – by removing residency requirements to vote?

Laws as to elections
Speaking of which, Section 46 enumerates laws they envisioned in 1982, saying, “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature may provide for the election of members of the Assembly, including (without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power) the following matters, that is to say— a) the qualifications and disqualifications of voters and candidates; b) the registration of voters; c) the ascertainment of the qualification of voters and of candidates for election; d) the division of Anguilla into electoral districts for the purpose of elections; e) the holding of elections;” Hmm. Sounds like residency qualifications could change with a single trip to the House and a single law!
But beyond laws regulating voting and elections processes, this Chapter also considered laws for, “f) the determination of any question whether any person has been validly elected a member … or whether the seat of any elected member… has become vacant; g) the definition and trial of offences connected with elections and the imposition of penalties therefor, including the disqualification for membership… or for registration as a voter or for voting at elections, of any person concerned in any such offence; h) and the disqualification for election as members… of persons holding or acting in any office the functions of which involve any responsibility for, or in connection with, the conduct of any election or the compilation or revision of any electoral register.” [… = “of the Assembly”; 1]
And in 2019, the amendment enshrined legislative powers to enact a single island-wide district, to determine how many single district members may be “returned” to the House, and empower voters to choose their own district leadership – as well as vote for as many seats as established from the island-wide slate.[2]

Residency Requirements, Policy Politics – and GST
And back to the democratic debate about our diaspora and whether they should be welcomed home to vote, or if the Home of AI can offer a secure, virtual means to enfranchise those defined as “Anguillians” no matter where they reside. Notably, “As of 2020 a total of 141 countries grant non-residents such as emigrants or expatriates the right to non-resident citizen voting…[including] in person at diplomatic missions or other physical locations, by post or online…[for] the national legislature, executive elections, referendums, or sub-national elections.” [4]
Many may recall, however, that the election of 2020 was believed to effectively exclude the diaspora due to Covid closures, helping the party that ran against GST to win 7 of 11 seats without widespread whispers of hushed homecomings. Then again, in 2025, with the borders wide open, the party that ran against GST won 8 of 11 seats. Hmm. Old fables of family voting seem to have faded, because the electorate appears to have voted more on policy than progeny in recent years.
On this topic, the Constitution seems clear: That a single trip to the House to pass a new law could enfranchise all proudly proven Anguillians – without need for Constitutional review or revision. Likewise, we saw on July 29, 2025, that a culturally intrusive law that contravened prior Constitutional rights could be repealed with a single vote in the House.[5] So. Will we join other countries by officially enfranchising our People, including all Anguillians, through leading-edge tech, as our new moniker suggests? And… will the next election be won by those running against the continuing civil rights challenges of the General Services Tax (GST) – or by those who can say they repealed it?

Repeal General Services Tax – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1] The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] The Anguilla Constitution (Amendment) Order 2019; [3] The Anguilla Constitution (Amendment) Order 1990; [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-resident_citizen_voting; [5] General Services Act, 2025.

They came to Anguilla for a funeral. Not the kind of trip anyone plans with excitement—flights to arrange, black clothing and sadness folded into suitcases, conversations heavy with memory. Grief brought our family together, but once we were here, we realized that though this moment was born of loss it was also an opportunity––an opportunity to ensure that younger generations feel connected to this place we call home.

Some were visiting for the first time. Others had been away for far too long. We wanted them to see Anguilla—not the postcard version, but the Anguilla that shaped us; the one that existed before paved roads and modern conveniences. To take us on this journey, we reached out to our cousin Carl Webster (CJ). CJ is young, but as we learned over the course of a few hours, he carries a deep knowledge of Anguilla’s history. He rattled off dates, names, and events with ease, pointing out ruins, former plantations, old wells, and forgotten spaces hidden beneath brush. What might have look like overgrown land to us, he described as living chapters of our island’s story.

Time was short, so we made the most of it. We stopped at the Miriam Gumbs Home to visit Daddie (Eldridge “Coo” Webster)—biological father to some of those visiting, but ‘Daddie’ to us all. Though CJ did not speak much there, history still found its way into the conversation. Coo shared stories of his days of sailing between the islands taking produce and bringing back supplies and other goods to Anguilla.

We visited the Old Courthouse which now holds the Heritage Museum Collection. While we were unable to experience a full tour of the facility, we stood in a space that became deeply personal to our family. One of our ancestors, Augustus “Chappy” Vanterpool, spent time in the lower level of the courthouse––as a prisoner. We shared stories and learned of Chappy’s adventures including his daring breaks from the prison on more than one occasion.

CJ explained how changes had been made to the building over the years. We saw where prisoners were once held. He described the physical constraints they endured; the thick walls––made from local limestone rock, the strategic layout, and separation of spaces––each telling their own story of a bygone era.
We lingered there longer than expected, imagining how our great-great-grandfather must have felt. He was tall, so we joked that perhaps he simply stepped through a window to make his escape. But beneath the laughter was something more complicated—a clearer understanding of the choices that led him there and the confines he existed in. In that moment Anguilla’s history was personal.
From there, we made a short visit to Wallblake House, walking the grounds and exploring nearby ruins. There is something about ruins that forces one’s imagination to fill in the blanks. We shared our thoughts on how workers may have moved among those spaces serving those who live at the house.
As the sun began to set, CJ took us to an area in South Hill––the Hughes Plantation. Not all of us ventured into the bush, but we were all struck by something else entirely—how much more mature CJ seemed in just those few short hours. His passion for the island’s past was unmistakable.

By the end of the day, something had shifted. We still admired the beaches and the hotels that draw visitors to our island. But we were reminded that Anguilla is more than sand, sea, and sun. It is more than stone foundations and overgrown fields. It is the preserved and unpreserved plantation houses. It is oral stories carried forward—by young people determined not to let them fade. It is home.
We were not able to visit every site CJ had planned, but what began as a week of sadness ended with us feeling more grounded. We left with a deeper understanding that while Anguilla continues to evolve, its history stands—not as a relic, but as foundation.

In next week’s issue, we will share CJ’s views on preserving and sharing Anguilla’s history.

By Kareen Rogers

In our 1982 Anguilla Constitution Order – the House of Assembly is the workplace of our elected representatives to debate opportunities and challenges to address through policies and legislation. However, limitations set forth in preceding sections with respect to the Governor’s, Deputy Governor’s and Attorney Generals’ (AG) powers provide a context for concern. [1]

“There shall be a House of Assembly” – of Anguillians

Section 35 begins Chapter IV of the Constitution simply stating that Anguilla will have a House of Assembly, and that it shall “consist of – the Speaker” and “two ex-officio members, namely the Attorney General” and in 1990, the Deputy Governor replaced the PS Finance – and “not less than seven members elected in the manner provided by law”. There were two nominated members until 2019, when four elected “single district” seats were added.[1,2,3] Having the People choose them strengthened the democracy, but they kept two appointees accountable to the monarch, not the People. Baby steps.

House of Assembly Qualifications

Section 36 continues with qualifications, including voter registration in an electoral district, twenty-one years of age, and birth ? and residence ? in Anguilla “at the date of his nomination for election”; or living in Anguilla for at least 3 years before and on “the date of his nomination … and is the son or daughter [or grandchild, 2019], of parents at least one of whom was born in Anguilla.’[1,2] Whereas residency is under growing scrutiny for voters, but less so for parliamentarians.

House of Assembly Disqualifications

Section 37 counters, saying, “No person shall be qualified to be nominated or elected as a member of the Assembly who— holds or is acting in any office of emolument in the service of the Crown” [exclusive of “his services as such a member” – and for temporary appointees, see Section 40] …or who is “adjudged or otherwise declared bankrupt… certified to be insane or otherwise adjudged to be of unsound mind… under sentence of death imposed on him by a court in any [country, 2019] or is under a sentence of imprisonment… exceeding twelve months [for an offense also recognised under Anguillian law, 2019]…or is disqualified for membership of the Assembly by any law… relating to offences connected with elections.”[1,2] That’s reassuring, except that any future law can amend the constitution.

The Section then details how “two or more terms of imprisonment” can be treated as one, but they would not be disqualifying if imposed as an alternative to a fine. Would Mandela have been qualified?

Tenure of office of members of Assembly

Section 38 then describes how a “nominated or elected” member’s seat becomes “vacant” to define the term of office – “upon a dissolution of the Assembly…if, without prior notice to the Governor, he is absent from three consecutive meetings… ceases to be [an Anguillian, 2019]… to be resident … resigns his seat by writing … to the Governor…” or if any of the preceding – or following – reasons should apply. [1,2]

Section 39 stipulates that being sentenced to death – or imprisonment for over 12 months – would vacate the member’s seat “thirty days thereafter” but that the Speaker could add 30-day increments for up to 330 days, if requested for appeals. However, the period could extend further if approved by “the Assembly signified by resolution.” [1] Well, if not put to death by then.

That said, Clause 2 states that “a free pardon or [if] his conviction is set aside or his sentence is reduced to a term of imprisonment of less than twelve months or a punishment other than imprisonment is substituted, his seat in the Assembly shall not become vacant…and he may again perform his functions.”[1] While a convicted member seems undesirable, these allowances pay deference to the will of the People and the risk of unjust laws, well, assuming the member kept his or her election promises.

Appointed members of Assembly

Section 40 states that an appointed member’s absence due to “illness… absence from Anguilla or for any other reason incapable of performing” … “the Governor acting in his discretion may, by… public seal, appoint any public officer to be temporarily a member of the Assembly” at the monarch’s “pleasure” and shall vacate his seat when “informed by the Governor” that the appointee can resume his duties. Nonetheless, it requires that “any public officer” be held to the same standards as the ex-officio member,[1] despite the contradiction regarding emoluments in Section 37.

In 1990, an amendment also empowered the Governor to appoint the leader of the opposition if, in the Governor’s judgement, he represents an opposition party with the greatest “numerical strength” in the House, or “best able to command the support of the [opposition] members.”[3] So, the Governor can anoint the Opposition and appoint two House members accountable to the Crown, but not the People.

Determination of questions as to membership of Assembly

Section 41 anticipated challenges to membership. The validity of being appointed or vacating a seat as “a temporary member of the Assembly…shall be determined by the Governor acting in his discretion.” [1,2] Whereas questions of elected membership or vacated seats “shall be determined by the High Court, whose decision shall be final and not subject to any appeal.” While few individuals have the resources to appeal to the High Court, Section 41 gives the right to challenge an elected member to “a person who voted or had the right to vote at the election…a person claiming to have had the right to be returned at such election… alleging himself to have been a candidate at such election; or the Attorney-General.” [1] However, only an elected member of the Assembly or the AG can apply to the High Court to question if an elected member has vacated his seat.

But this section reserves one more power to the AG, saying, “If any application referred to in …this subsection is made by a person other than the Attorney-General, the Attorney-General may intervene and may then appear or be represented in the proceedings.” [1] Appointed by the Crown, could the AG also terminate such challenges, no matter the concerns of an elected member?

Penalty for sitting or voting in Assembly when un-qualified

Section 42 puts a bow on member decorum, saying, “Any person who sits or votes in the Assembly knowing or having reasonable grounds for knowing that he is not entitled to do so shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding EC$100.00 for each day upon which he sits or votes” and that the fine may be collected by civil action in the High Court or a suit by the AG. [1] Ah, if only.

Appointed members over-riding elected members’ votes

Ultimately, these House of Assembly sections expose the gulf between the law and recent customs of ex-officio members. That is, to refrain from voting on contentious matters that could have far-reaching impact on a society or the financial framework of the territory. And for the AG to recuse himself when giving legal advice to members of parliament. Had such customs been followed in 2021, GST would not have passed – and the current Government would not have had to compromise by passing the General Services Tax Act in 2025, which reimposed lost rights and fiscal fetters on our People and businesses when they, in fact, repealed GST.[4] A better way? The House of Assembly members “shall be elected in the manner prescribed by any law in force in Bermuda.” [5] Elected. Not appointees with voting rights.

So. Will Anguilla consider best practices for internal self-governance, with guardrails on appointees and the Governor’s discretion? And… will checks and balances be enshrined to prevent – or to fast-track the repeal – of newly oppressive laws put forth by appointees unaccountable to the People?

Repeal General Services Tax – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.

[1] The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] The Anguilla Constitution (Amendment) Order 2019; [3] The Anguilla Constitution (Amendment) Order 1990; [4] General Services Act, 2025; [5] Bermuda Constitutional Order 1968; Section 28 amended by UK SI 456/2003.

The name “Menes” invariably strikes a note of fond familiarity for a man of high honour in the Anguillian community. As a consequence, the morning of Friday, January 30th saw a show of solemn support and love as all-and-sundry converged at the Pro-Cathedral of St. Mary in The Valley to pay their last respects to the life of this noble man, Reverend Father Vanier Menes Hodge.

Rev. Father Menes Hodge was truly “a man of the cloth”. According to an extract from the pages of his Formal Remembrance his profound and enduring legacy was within the Anglican Church, where he had answered the call of God with humility and resolve.

The funeral service began with several video presentations dedicated to the Reverend’s memory and snapshots of reflections on his life were read from his eulogy by two of his sons, Arnie and Trevor.
The reflections spanned a scope of history that chronicled the Reverend’s childhood; his upbringing; his education; his diligent apprenticeship as a carpenter, then as an Agricultural Officer in the Public Service; his dedication as a Customs Officer; his professionalism as a Director of Broadcasting at Radio Anguilla; his loyalty as a Principal Assistant Secretary in the Chief Minister’s Office; and his epic service as a devoted member of the Rotary Club.
Rev. Father Menes Hodge was an avid Commissioner of Scouts, and attained the Silver Acorn award for prolonged service in Scouting. He was naturally “always prepared” even as the Scouts Motto dictates. It was this mode of preparation that caused him to answer the call of God in 1975 as a Lay Reader in St. Mary’s Anglican Church, becoming ordained to the Diaconate in 1993. He further advanced the call of God into Christian service through his ordination to the Holy Priesthood in 1996.

His funeral service proceeded as undertakers wheeled his casket up the aisle, led by opening sentences pronounced by the Right Reverend Ernest Flemming, Bishop of the Diocese of the North Eastern Caribbean and Aruba, accompanied by Priest in charge, Canon Reid Simon. The hymn “How Great Though Art” was sung, followed by the first scripture reading delivered by Reverend Hodge’s daughter, Menesa Campbell, Esq.

The singing of Psalm 23 preceded the second reading by his son, Vanroy Hodge. The Combined Choir then melodiously sang Richard Smallwood’s signature song “Healing”. The Gospel from St. John 14:1-6 was read by Canon Reid Simon. Reverend Hodge’s younger brother, the Venerable Valentine Hodge presented the sermon. Prior to delivering the actual sermon, however, he conveyed words of comfort to the children of Reverend Hodge from the extended family.

“I am sure I would be speaking on behalf of everyone here today, together with those sharing in the various media, in extending our most sincere condolences and the assurance of our prayers to Menes’s four children, Ash, Trevor, Vanroy and Menesa and their families. At the same time, we wish to remember with gratitude his wife Britannia, deceased, and his daughters Joy and Mathis who have preceded their dad in death.
“Condolences go out also to his siblings, Elvese in Texas, Stafford in Virginia, Joycelyn in the UK and Roy of the Virgin Islands who is with us here today.”

“Recently I found on Facebook,” he continued, “where someone was lauding the ideals of family life, saying that there is nothing like family. That is a sentiment which I would readily endorse.” “I wish that more people would recognize the value of family bonds and the need for unity within the family.”

Archdeacon Emeritus Valentine Hodge reminisced growing up with Menes, and he reflected upon the youthful days of their development, especially their experiences in riding a 2-horsepower Triumph Tiger Cub motorbike. He spoke about the many falls they sustained and said, “We both learnt how to recover from falling only by falling. By falling off that bike several times, we eventually learnt what balance feels like. And people who have never fallen are actually riding life off balance.”

Then, focusing on the sermon, he elaborated on St. John 13: 12-15. He explained how Jesus, the master teacher, taught his disciples the valuable lesson of Christian service, demonstrating the lesson of humility. He explained that as Christ washed the feet of His followers, He required them to wash one another’s feet, likewise, even as he was humble enough to wash theirs.

“My Brothers and sisters,” he charged, “more and more in our world today we need people who are willing to serve others rather than to be served. We need more persons who are willing to wash the feet of others rather than just to have their own feet washed.”

“It is for this reason that service above self should become the motto of all Christ-like people,” he stressed. “So we see that Father Menes’ life was characterized by service to humanity. And in this way he tried to imitate his Master, our blessed Lord.”
Following the sermon, the Holy Communion was offered, followed by the Prayer of Thanksgiving, A Hymn (Lead Us Heavenly Father Lead Us), The Commendation, the Nunc Dimittis, and The Blessing. The final hymn sung was “To God be the Glory”. The interment took place at a plot, just a stone’s throw from the church building.

As a tribute to his fatherhood, his surviving children have borrowed a line from the pen of Focus on the Family’s James Dobson: “A Good father will leave his imprint on his children for the rest of their lives.”

May his soul rest in perpetual peace.

Attackers FC is proud to announce a new chapter in its history through a renewed partnership with long-time player, captain, supporter and former sponsor Mr. Ian “Sugar George” Edwards, founder and managing director of Sugar George Inc and Sunset Homes.
Sugar George who played with the Club through the period 1996 – 2014, played a critical role as he helped the Club win many titles throughout the mentioned period.

Sugar George did whatever it took to keep the Club existence going. He donated his time, coached the Club, sponsored the Club and as a former player, has remained a devoted follower of the team over the years. His enduring passion for football and commitment to community development have inspired him to once again invest in the growth and success of the Club.

With this new sponsorship, the Club will now be officially known as Sugar George Attackers FC.
Speaking on the partnership, Sugar George expressed his enthusiasm: “Football has always been close to my heart, and Attackers FC has played a vital role in shaping the sporting spirit of our community. I am honored to once again be part of this journey and look forward to seeing the team reach new heights.”
Club representatives also welcomed the renewed partnership, noting that Sugar George’s support will provide critical resources for player development, youth programs, and community engagement initiatives.

Attackers FC, now Sugar George Attackers FC, continues to be one of the leading Clubs in local football, known for its discipline, resilience, and deep community roots. The Club looks forward to the upcoming season with optimism and a strengthened sense of pride under its new name.

– Press Release

Anguillian-born technology professional Dexter Gumbs has launched Polliglot AI, an artificial intelligence-powered translation platform designed to help creators, educators, students, businesses and organisations break language barriers and reach global audiences more effectively.

Polliglot AI enables users to upload a video file, select a target language, and receive a translated video with accurate subtitles or translated audio in just a few steps. The platform supports multiple languages including English, French, Spanish, Hindi, Tamil and others, with additional languages being added as the service expands. The name is derived from the word “polyglot,” meaning a person who speaks multiple languages, reflecting the platform’s purpose of enabling communication across language barriers through artificial intelligence and global connectivity.

The platform is web-based and built on Amazon Web Services’ (AWS) infrastructure, ensuring secure storage, encrypted uploads and downloads and fast processing times. The platform also prioritizes user privacy and data protection. To access it, search www.polliglot.ai in a web browser.

A 30-day free trial is available for any of the 4 plans namely the basic, the pro, the enterprise and the pro enterprise. No hidden charges exist and users can test the platform before committing. Every plan includes AI-powered video translation, speech recognition and subtitling, cloud storage via AWS and encrypted uploads and downloads. The company offers multiple subscription tiers designed to support individual users, teams, and enterprise-level needs, with varying features and support options. Persons interested in utilising the services of Polliglot.ai can locate pricing and other information on their website.

Mr. Gumbs, who currently resides in the United States, has more than a decade of experience in information technology, cloud computing and artificial intelligence systems, primarily working with Amazon Web Services (AWS). Over the years, he has been involved in designing and supporting large-scale cloud applications and has operated an online IT training school offering professional certification courses. Mr. Gumbs believes that since Anguilla is labeled as the “home of AI”, we should maximize the label and while his creation is the beginning, he looks forward to helping other Anguillians grow and innovate in the AI realm.

Recently, Mr. Gumbs extended his work to Anguilla by providing artificial intelligence training opportunities to young Anguillians, awarding scholarships to students preparing for internationally recognised AWS certification exams. Several participants successfully completed the programme, marking an early step toward building local technical capacity in AI and cloud technologies.
Mr. Gumbs said the idea for Polliglot AI was driven by the growing demand for multilingual video content and Anguilla’s global recognition as the home of the “.ai” domain.
“Video is now the primary way people communicate online,” Gumbs said. “Polliglot AI allows Anguillians and global users alike to share their stories, businesses, and educational content with the world in multiple languages without needing expensive translation teams.”

From an Anguillian perspective, the launch of Polliglot AI represents a move toward developing practical artificial intelligence products linked to Anguilla rather than relying solely on domain name revenue. Mr. Gumbs has indicated plans to continue expanding AI education initiatives and has outlined future projects in areas such as healthcare technology and autonomous marine systems, with the long-term goal of creating technology-based employment and entrepreneurship opportunities for Anguillians.
“I want young Anguillians to see that artificial intelligence is something they can build, not just something they use,” Mr. Gumbs said. “It’s a real industry that can create jobs and allow people to stay in Anguilla.”

For more information, contact support@polliglot.ai or WhatsApp +1(240) 926-6678.

By: Rhonica Connor

Happy 2026 – to all who can afford to enjoy it! Following the Festive holidays and celebrations to ring in the New Year, it seems some food price frustrations are curiously festering despite relief. A couple of dates from the Old Year may offer more insight if we consider April 2 in the US and August 1 in Anguilla.

April 2 in the US was “Liberation Day” when the president declared new tariffs across the world! Yes, Americans were “freed” from decades of free trade that had given them – and us – globally competitive pricing on our goods primarily imported from their country. [1]

And on August 1, the People of Anguilla were liberated from paying GST on retail, wholesale and restaurant goods and services, and on the “goods” but not the “services” of manufacturers (they were unexpectedly denied full exemption). You know, like having a water or pump truck deliver water or concrete, as if you could buy such goods with a shopping bag and walk home?

Coincidentally, Tax Foundation analysts also reported that “On August 1, tariffs on US goods imports [were] scheduled to increase for more than 80 countries. With about 71 percent of US goods imports already facing President Trump’s minimum tariffs of 10 percent, much of the attention has focused on how tariffs will impact the manufactured goods sector. However, a variety of food imports are also impacted by the tariffs, and these will likely lead to higher food prices for consumers.” [2]

US Tariffs Affecting Anguillian Food Prices?
In fact, Tax Foundation analysts warned last July that tariffs would ripple through US food supply chains – just when GST Relief would begin. They described how a beverage company might switch source countries for aluminum in their cans, but that items like bananas and the flavours of Brazilian coffee could not be produced in the US. That would lead to passing on tariffs without options. [2] While we have regional coffee and our own banana alternatives, the impact is inescapable.

They continued, “In 2024, the US imported about $221 billion in food products, 74 percent of which ($163 billion) faced the Trump tariffs… they will exceed 30 percent for some countries if the reciprocal tariffs go into effect on August 1. The top five exporters of food products to the US, in order, are Mexico, Canada, the EU, Brazil, and China, accounting for 62 percent of total US food imports.” [2]

Tough Timing for Anguillian Consumers – and Leaders
Think about it. US tariffs took effect the same week 13% GST was repealed from goods while replacing duty previously re-named Interim Goods Tax, which we had always paid. Except for one thing: reinstated duty did not apply to food – which was exempted from GST in December 2024.

Thus, 13% savings on all goods, “confectionaries” and other newly exempted food items taxed by the previous government were countered by “10 percent to 30 percent” US tariffs on “food products” at the same time. Some wrongly blamed higher food prices on restoring pre-GST duties, because they were not added to food. Yet others blamed merchants for adding tariff impacts and accused them of gouging. They also created pressure to destroy freedom of commerce from a new law establishing unrestricted powers for business inspections, goods seizures, and fines. [3] Taking rights, as with GST.

By October, Premier Richardson Hodge explained, “We here are experiencing issues from the increases in tariffs that have impacted not just Anguilla, but all of the other countries that import items coming through the US…This is resulting in higher food prices. …as a result of Anguilla’s businesses importing products from the US, we, like other countries are now suffering from high commodity prices due to the recently imposed US tariffs.”[4]

So why are some still saying, “They promised relief, but putting duties back made food more expensive…”? Is it an excuse for those who wanted to keep GST, so customers paid double for their utility taxes? Remember: those taxes were built into prices before GST renamed them! If any, blame must go to US tariffs, not to duties we always paid, and which were not added back to food, regardless.

Growing American – and Global – Grocery Angst…
By November, Americans expressed their pricing pain at the polls. They handed handy wins to Democrats in a handful of off-cycle elections where Republicans had fared much better in the past. That political pressure led Trump to rescind some tariffs, “…in the face of growing angst among American consumers about the high cost of groceries.” [5]

Reuters reported rollbacks on many products that “…have seen double-digit year-over-year price increases. …over 200 items ranging from oranges, acai berries and paprika to cocoa, chemicals used in food production, fertilizers and even communion wafers.” Whereas “ground beef…was nearly 13% more… and steaks cost almost 17% more …” than a year earlier. [5]

And US price pressures persist from immigration policies affecting farm workers to tariffs on imported goods not rolled back in November. Whereas our Statistics Department just reported 1.2% overall inflation here, despite 1.3% lower food prices in the fourth quarter and 6.6% lower than 2024 – but, as US businesses have absorbed a large share of tariffs to date, “items with low profit margins, including groceries, may be among the first to rise” in 2026.[6,7] Thus, as these are averages, some prices may still seem higher, while others inch back to earlier levels due to erratic tariffs that continue.
Meanwhile, on December 30, the British Navy reported Russian attacks on ships in Black Sea ports attempting to load Ukrainian wheat, posing further risks to “global food security” [8].

Cost of Living vs. Lost Liberty
Nearly every household in Anguilla depends on prepared food from time to time, if not daily, to manage getting to work and getting children to school. And those time – and cost – pressures increase whenever anyone needs second or third jobs to pay their bills. Beyond completely removing GST from grocery stores, GST Relief made restaurant and bakery food more affordable, as even the smallest venues were pressured to register and collect it. Can you imagine today’s prices if we were still paying 13% more without relief? This government delivered on their promise.

If only they had promised to restore our civil rights lost under GST. When they replaced it with GST on services, did the technocrats force a compromise for financial relief? They notably retained their powers to oppress businesses left in the services snare – and the rest of us still subjected to lost rights and 26 ways to criminalise commerce. Yes, the General Services Tax Act reduced a few shocking penalties, but it continues to make a farce of the Constitution!

How? In an intimate society our size, intrusive taxation should stop at inspecting boxes at the border, not bank statements – without cause or court orders. For example, the General Services Tax Act exposes every lawyer to arbitrary audits of fees paid for some of the most private matters in our lives. And anyone can be called under oath to give evidence against a merchant – or forced self-incrimination, without a lawyer. Yet, even if liberated from GST, businesses remain at risk of predatory prosecution – in perpetuity. And they may also be forced to undergo audits going back many years, just to be removed from the registry! [9]

So, many food prices may seem higher than ever, now inflated by US tariffs. But. The price of our lost rights and privacy is the highest price we are still forced to pay!

Repeal GST – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberation_Day_tariffs; [2] https://taxfoundation.org/blog/trump-tariffs-food-prices/; [3] Consumer Protection Policy, Ministry of Finance, Feb 2023; [4] https://theanguillian.com/2025/10/premier-attributes-high-food-prices-to-us-tariffs/
[5] https://www.reuters.com/business/trump-cuts-tariffs-beef-coffee-other-foods-inflation-concerns-mount-2025-11-14/; [6] Anguilla’s Consumer Price Index, 4Q25; [7] https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/03/business/tariffs-prices-2026; [8] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/dec/31/ukraine-war-briefing-attack-on-global-food-security-as-russia-hits-wheat-ships-and-ports; [9] General Services Tax Act, 2025.

Since last Saturday morning (January 3rd, 2026), news networks across the globe have been occupied in reporting on the developing story of Maduro’s “secretive” capture by America’s renowned military might, Delta Force. Though the masses may deem the surgical attack which resulted in the removal of the Venezuelan President, as a violation of international law, it is hoped that in the long run this act of willful aggression would prove to be beneficial to the Venezuelan people.

Notwithstanding, it is rather ironic to realize that even as President Donald Trump had made himself a broker of peace between Hamas and Israel, and even though he has been seeking peace between Russia and Ukraine, and though he claims to be the initiator of peace for eight wars, he, as an apparent international peace icon, has used his power as US Commander- in-Chief to launch a stealthy night-time attack in the bombing of Venezuela, capturing President Nicolas Maduro and his wife under the cover of darkness during Friday night.

“It was dark. The lights of Caracas were largely turned off due to our expertise,” Trump boasted. “It was dark and deadly.”

Yes, it was indeed a dark and deadly kind of stealthy capture. Well orchestrated; well calculated. In fact, one prominent US general reported that this military operation, known as “Operation Absolute Resolve”, had been months in the planning and was well rehearsed. But there is one question that looms among news reporters and legal analysts. It is a question that baffles me, as well. And that is whether the Friday night attack and the capture of Maduro and his wife was a legal act, according to international law and standard diplomatic norms.

One begs to question: how can Trump use his military might to attack a sovereign country without the approval of Congress who is designed to authorize and regulate such military missions in foreign countries. But Secretary of State Marco Rubio is known to say that if Congress was informed beforehand, or if congressional authority was sought as pre-strike protocol, then there would have been a high probability that the carefully crafted mission would have been foiled through a potential leak.

I tend to think that whether or not Congress was apprised of the pending attack, and whether or not it had given its approval, the mission would have been carried out anyway, for the world’s largest American owned aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, along other destroyers carrying heavy military arsenal were not positioned out in Venezuelan waters for months just for nothing. Besides, several ‘barbaric’ airstrikes were made against boats heading north, suspected of transporting cocaine to the US. They were systematically, mercilessly obliterated – an indication that something of a higher magnitude was in the making.

So, most likely, congress’s disapproval would not have deterred President Trump from ordering this carefully-crafted attack. After all, it seems like this US President can do no wrong. He enjoys the privilege of presidential immunity granted him by the Supreme Court anyway, and officers of the Trump administration have expressed that there was a legitimate right for the attack that brought about the capture of Maduro in order to bring him to justice.

Now the Venezuelan President and his wife are being charged in a Manhattan court. He is indicted on charges of working with international drug-trafficking groups for the last two decades, shipping their illicit drug merchandise to the US. She is charged with accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars as bribes related to this narcotics trade. The charges also include narcotics terrorism, and the possession of high powered machine guns and destructive devices poised against the US.

It is common knowledge that President Nicolas Maduro had been a ruthless, repressive dictatorial-style leader of Venezuela – a developing country which was once richened from oil reserves but which has now been reduced to a country of abject poverty where only the affluent and powerful thrive. Many Venezuelans who had opposed Maduro’s rule had been kidnapped and killed by brutish forces loyal to the dictator, and millions of refugees had to flee the economically debased country which still holds the world’s richest crude oil reserves.

And so, while President Trump issued his military orders to attack on the guise that Maduro was destroying the lives of millions of Americans through unfettered cocaine trafficking, it is evident that the President’s real goal was to take advantage of Venezuela’s massive oil reserves to further enrich American oil tycoons like Mobile, Exxon and Chevron.

“As everyone knows the oil business in Venezuela has been a total burst for a long period of time,” Trump said. “But we are going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest in the world, to go in, spend billions of dollars to fix the badly broken oil infrastructure and start making money for the country.”

He insisted that America will be running the country. But to what extent that “running” will involve America’s military might is still left to be seen. With that being said, it is hoped that in the next couple of years we will see the promise of fruits realized from this stealthy attack. And it is expected that within a couple more subsequent years, Venezuela will be prospering from the revived crude oil industry. Yes, it is hoped that the end will justify the means.

And no matter what becomes of Mr. and Mrs. Maduro, it is hoped that Venezuela will see a change of direction – a change for the economic, political and social betterment of the country. If the US really runs Venezuela, as Trump claimed, it is hoped that in the not too distant future we can see a harmonious relationship between the Venezuelan Government and the Americans, where not only the Americans pillage the country’s reserves for its rich moguls, but where Caracas and the Venezuelan people can benefit and grow from strength to strength.

Continuing to consider our 1982 constitution – executive powers are conferred by Her (now, His) Majesty to the Governor, Acting Governor and Deputy, Executive Council and Secretary thereto, Chief Minister (now, Premier), and the Attorney General in Chapters II and III. [1] Most of us take most of these formalities and powers for granted and assume accountability for good governance to be among them. That said, some seemingly arbitrary powers merit our awareness instead of our assumptions.

Chapter II: The Governor – Serving at “Majesty’s Pleasure”
Section 19 begins with clarity, saying, “There shall be a Governor of Anguilla, who shall be appointed by Her Majesty and hold office during Her Majesty’s pleasure,” with powers “conferred or imposed on him by this Constitution or any other law and such other powers as Her Majesty may from time to time be pleased to assign to him…but no court shall enquire whether or not he has complied with any such Instructions.”[1] This appears to limit a Governor’s accountability to the monarch, alone.

Acting Governor
Section 20 addressed “any period when the office of Governor is vacant or the Governor is absent from Anguilla [> 48 hours], or is for any other reason unable to perform” whereby the monarch could designate an Acting Governor through the Secretary of State, or that, “the Attorney-General shall, during Her Majesty’s pleasure, act in the office of Governor” once they have taken appropriate oaths, and serve until notified of the Governor’s resumption of duties.[1] One recent example was Paul Candler’s role following Dileeni Daniel-Selvaratnam’s service and before the arrival of Julia Crouch in 2023.[2]

Governor’s deputy
Before Deputy Governors, Section 21 described how “the Governor…may in his discretion, by writing under his hand, appoint the Attorney-General…” or another “suitable person in Anguilla to be his deputy” to fulfill the duties as Governor until the monarch or the Governor revoke the role at their discretion; “…but no court shall enquire whether or not he has complied with any such instructions.”[1] Really?

Chapter III: The Executive
Section 22 echoes royal powers, but it allowed for delegation in Subsection 2: “Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the executive authority of Anguilla may be exercised on behalf of Her Majesty by the Governor …but nothing in this subsection shall operate so as to prejudice the provisions of any laws … whereby functions are, or may be, conferred on persons or authorities other than the Governor.”[1] Well, except for Sections 27 and 28, to follow.

Section 23 established Executive Council to include the “Chief Minister [now, Premier], not more than three other Ministers and two ex-officio members” naming the AG and PS, Finance ? at that time. [1]

Appointment of Ministers – “Acting in His Discretion”
While the composition of a sitting government has been amended since 1982, it was interesting to see that, “The Governor, acting in his discretion, shall appoint as the Chief Minister the elected member of the Assembly who, in his judgment, is likely to command the support of a majority of the elected members of the Assembly”; and other Ministers would be appointed “in accordance with the advice of the Chief Minister…”[1]

What if, in “his discretion” the Governor wanted to appoint a Minister who was not the leader of the newly elected party? Or can the Governor appoint another Premier even if the incumbent party retained legislative majority? Why decide who is “likely” to be chosen by one’s peers – instead of allowing one’s peers to choose? And could anyone ask the court to debate who is “likely” to have the support of the elected members, since “no court shall enquire” regarding the Governor’s actions? Hmm.

Tenure of office of members
Section 25 enshrined that the Governor must “dissolve the Assembly” and set the date for a new election following a two-thirds “lack of confidence” vote in the Government. After an election [for that, or routine cycles?], the [Premier] “shall vacate his office” if the Governor tells him that he is “about to appoint another person as the Chief Minister.” Other reasons include: ceasing to be a member of the Assembly; not being elected; resignation; or if a court sentences him to “death or to imprisonment (by whatever name called) for a term exceeding twelve months.” [1] They thought of everything!

The Section goes on to state that other Ministers shall also be terminated by the Chief Minister [Premier] or the Governor with advice of the Chief Minister.[1]

Ministerial Duties – and Accountability without Authority?
Section 26 states that the Governor may “authorise any other Minister” to fulfill the [Premier’s] duties if unable to do so from illness or absence – and to revoke that authority “…in his discretion if, in his judgment, it is impracticable to obtain the Chief Minister’s advice owing to his illness or absence,” but otherwise with the [Premier’s] advice.[1]

Section 27 also starts off with the Governor and Premier in consultation to “assign to any Minister responsibility for the conduct (subject to the provisions of this Constitution and of any other law) of any business of the Government of Anguilla including responsibility for the administration of any department of government” – “Provided that a Minister shall not be charged with responsibility under this section for…matters mentioned in subsection (2)(a) and (b) of the next following section.”[1] …(a) “relates to defence, external affairs or internal security, including the police;” and (b)? Ministers are barred from:

28. (2)(b) “…the appointment (including the appointment on promotion or transfer, appointment on contract and appointment to act in an office) of any person to any public office, the suspension, termination of employment, dismissal, or retirement of any public officer or taking of disciplinary action in respect of such an officer, the application to any public officer of the terms or conditions of employment of the public service (including salary scales, allowances, leave, passages or pensions) for which financial provision has been made;”[1] So, is that why “any person in any public office” may not feel accountable to implementing policies for which the People elected Ministers?

…and GST? A Pattern of Discretionary Powers
Maybe the latter section helps explain gaps between the GST Relief implementation for one of the promised sectors failing to receive full relief. But those discretionary powers must have flowed straight from His Majesty through the Governor’s hand when she signed the General Services Tax Act. One public officer holds dominion over GST: from registration; to audits and records confiscation; remittance of overpayments and security deposits; assessments; seeking travel restrictions and court seizures for goods, capital and immovable property; replacement of damaged tax certificates – and more! We are also reminded that, “No criminal proceedings in respect of any offence under this Act shall be commenced except where the Comptroller determines to bring charges and prosecute…[and] where the offence alleged involves the failure to do any act as required under this Act, within 5 years after the Comptroller has become aware of such failure”! [3] Yes, powers so discretionary that they require mind-reading, with exposure to criminal prosecution – forever? Wow.

So. Will Anguilla set new standards for all democracies with this Constitutional review? And… will checks and balances be enshrined where “no court shall enquire” and where new laws oppress us today?

Repeal GST – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1] The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Candler; [3] General Services Act, 2025.

Most of us will know the classic holiday song “I’ll be home for Christmas” which was written for soldiers longing to return home (during the Second World War) and recorded by Bing Crosby in 1943. While it contains elements such as snow and mistletoe that may be unfamiliar to us in the Caribbean, it is extremely popular and has been sung by many artists including the Mighty Sparrow. Unfortunately for some, this Christmas the song’s last line “If only in my dreams” will be their reality. Many friends and family members will however, thankfully, be home for Christmas. Some will be fortunate to be among the first to arrive through the brand-new beautiful terminal building at the Clayton J. Lloyd International Airport. At its opening ceremony last Friday December 12th, one of the honourees, Pieter Carter, spoke of the fateful Christmas Eve 48 years ago when Captain Clayton J. Lloyd lost his life and others perished with him on the aircraft trying to get home for Christmas.

Having experienced the last Christmas (2024) far away from the warmth of home, I truly look forward to being home for Christmas. And I really mean FAR AWAY FROM THE WARMTH. For I was on a fabulous excursion – a 14-day cruise to Antarctica, the most desired but least visited cruise destination in the World – as far South as one can travel unless you have special scientific tasks which permit you to, and, though it was the South Pole’s summer, it was bitterly cold. The visit was awesome in so many respects, but the feeling of being home with family and friends in my lovely island, Anguilla, is unmatched by any other experience.

Christmas at home was a magical experience during my childhood. My earliest recollections were of Five Finger Christmas trees cut down by my Dad from “in the bush” on the Junks Hole estate and erected in our Living Room. These trees, about 10 feet high, would be beautifully decorated with ornaments and lights, as we were fortunate to have a generator to provide electricity long before the mains supply reached our area in 1980. We would regularly be awakened by carollers with their string-band music. On Christmas mornings we would find our gifts under the Christmas Tree. Often, these would include toys for each one of us from our older cousin in the USA, Lincoln Lewis, whom we called Paipy Lindoo. We once got an entire toy band, guitar, wind instruments and drums, that really worked.

We would all go off to early morning church, decked out in our new Christmas clothes, and greet friends and family including those who had come “Home for Christmas” from the Virgin Islands, the USA and other countries around the world. Lunch extended into dinner, we would usually have a huge turkey brought in from St Thomas by one of our aunts, ham, goat and sheep meat, roasted potatoes, potato pudding, peas and rice, and much more. My mother would have baked many cakes, but her specialty was fruit cakes, which were heavenly. She would have had her fruits soaked in wine for many weeks and even the waxed paper between the finished product and the baking pans were fought over.

We would visit with our friends and cousins, and there would be a constant stream of visitors to our house as well. Sometimes dozens of us cousins would set off to pick ‘sherries’ and sea grapes, and somehow always end up in the sea at Junks Hole, Shoal Bay or Island Harbour. There would be Christmas concerts at school and at church which would always be well attended and show off the great natural talents of our young singers and actors.

Our toys in those days were mainly cowboy guns with paper shots for the boys, and dolls for the girls. We had squibs and sparklers which we would light, especially at night. Another fixture at nights was roast corn on the coal pot outside, with story telling as we waited for our next delicious roasted corn. The Christmas celebrations would go over into Boxing Day, when we would have a huge family picnic at Captain’s Bay. Our Christmas Tree would be kept in place until the 12 Days of Christmas were over, and we would have a huge bonfire afterward. One thing I regret in retrospect is that we didn’t save some of those magnificent specimens which we could spray green and reuse year after year. Because I doubt we will ever see their like again, and artificial trees are poor replacements for the Five Finger trees.

As I grew older the outside world began to beckon, indeed travel is now one of my favourite pursuits. My Aunt Mena lived in Aruba where she had worked for many years with the Lago Oil Company, and each of us children would go to visit her just before turning 12 when adult fares would apply. As my birthday is in January, I was fortunate to spend my first Christmas away in Aruba, which I enjoyed thoroughly. My next Christmas away from home was in Antigua two years later (1975) at the home of my Aunt Ursula and her husband whom I called Teacher Max, during his service as a SDA Pastor there. This time, the house was filled with youngsters around my age and we had an awesome time, window-shopping in St. Johns at night, getting into trouble, doing what young men do. A highlight was attending Midnight Mass at the St. John’s Cathedral where the choir’s rendition of the Hallelujah Chorus from Handel’s “Messiah” was surely one of the most memorable performances I have ever witnessed!

In the years following, I completed my studies at the Valley Secondary School (now the Albena Lake-Hodge Comprehensive School) and began studies at the St. Lucia A’ level College (now the Sir Arthur Lewis Community College). I always looked forward to coming home for every school vacation, which involved flying back and forth island-hopping on LIAT. As LIAT was headquartered in Antigua, I would always spend a few days there with my family coming home or on my way back to St. Lucia. This was the case in December 1977. For some reason I spent more time than usual in Antigua before heading to St Maarten on LIAT on December 24th, Christmas Eve, that fateful day that Pieter Carter had spoken of. I was standing at the desk of Valley Air Service at Princess Juliana International Airport waiting for my flight to Anguilla on that airline when Mr. Jeremiah Gumbs, who was a family friend, walked up to me and said, “Young man, what are you doing here?” I told him I was waiting for the plane to Anguilla. Captain Clayton Lloyd had been trying to help all who needed to get home for Christmas so my flight was delayed. Mr. Gumbs shouted, “Let’s go to Rendezvous!” He would have been there perhaps to meet guests at his hotel, Rendezvous Bay Hotel, and take them by his speedboat directly to Rendezvous Bay. I grabbed my suitcase and Naaman and Oniel Webster, the crew, took us quickly to Anguilla. They then drove me in their car towards Island Harbour (where they live), dropping me off at the top of the road a short distance from our house. A few minutes later I was seated in the Living Room watching St. Maarten TV, one of the only TV channels available at that time. Suddenly, the teleprinter flashed the chilling news that a Valley Air Service plane had crashed shortly after take-off and all aboard were feared dead. The very plane I was supposed to be on, flown by legendary Anguillian aviation pioneer Clayton J Lloyd, save for the intervention of God through Lloyd’s uncle, Jeremiah Gumbs! I could only sit there and tremble for what must have been a half-hour or so until I composed myself enough to go into the kitchen and tell my mother what had happened. Yes, I was home for Christmas, but under incredible circumstances that I will never forget. “Home for Christmas” will always have a special meaning for me. In fact, apart from last year, I can only recall spending one Christmas away from home since then.

This week, the first passengers will enter Anguilla through the brand-new terminal building at our airport which proudly bears the name Clayton J Lloyd International Airport, honouring Captain Lloyd who lost his life as he had lived it, serving his island and its people. Some of them will be coming home for Christmas. And many others will arrive at the Blowing Point Ferry Terminal to be home for Christmas, and take the Jeremiah Gumbs Highway out of Blowing Point, named after another legendary Anguillian pioneer and nation-builder. The question is, what is “Home for Christmas” like today, in 2025?

It is undeniable that Christmas in Anguilla has changed much over the past 50 years. We now have island-wide electricity, so there are lots more Christmas lights in homes and businesses. We can now fly home non-stop from several cities in the USA. We can call our family and friends all over the world on our cell phones which didn’t exist when I was younger. We can now buy all the turkey and ham that we wish right here in our stores. We can listen to Christmas carols and other songs on our phones and other devices. We can shop on our devices for whatever we desire. We have vehicles that we can drive to visit friends and families on paved roads, unlike the dusty unpaved roads which we used to have to walk or catch a ride on in the past. We have many more churches, many of them air-conditioned and more comfortable and better equipped than those in the decades past. But we seldom hear carollers anymore. Now the guns on the streets are no longer toys. Now, we seldom see the visiting friends and family because everyone has his or her own agenda and our schedules can’t seem to permit the picnics, church services or other get-togethers of the past.

It is my prayer that Christmas at Home will be a time of peace and joy, a time of refreshing of the spirit of togetherness, of sharing and of caring. If you are Home for Christmas, please take some time to reflect on the real meaning of Christmas, the real Reason for the Season. Whether you live here or you are visiting, let us all try to bring back some of the elements that used to make being home for Christmas so very wonderful. And let us thank God that we have the wonderful privilege to indeed be in this blessed and beautiful island with family and friends for Christmas 2025.

Shockwaves rippled across Anguilla on December 10, 2024, as news of the sudden passing of Vernon Leroy Gumbs spread throughout the island. Known affectionately as “Leroy,” he was a devoted Christian, a respected community figure, and the visionary founder of one of Anguilla’s leading construction firms.

Leeward Construction Co. Ltd, under his leadership, helped shape the physical landscape of Anguilla. Among its many accomplishments are some of the island’s most notable infrastructure projects, including the new Blowing Point Ferry Terminal, the airport cargo building, and the stage facility at the Landsome Bowl Cultural Centre.

With his unexpected passing came a wave of sorrow—and an inevitable question: What would become of the company he built, especially with critical projects already underway?

A hallmark of great leadership is preparing for continuity, and in this regard, Mr. Gumbs ensured that his legacy would endure. Leeward Construction was never left to chance. Instead, it remains not only operational but moving forward with purpose and stability.

For nearly 40 years, Mr. Gumbs ran the company alongside his wife and co-founder, Mrs. Denease Gumbs. Over the past year, she has continued to guide the organization with strength and vision, now joined by their son and newly appointed Managing Director, Denroy V. Gumbs.

Denroy is no stranger to the company’s inner workings. Having spent years working alongside his parents across various departments and construction seasons, he has long been deeply involved in the day-to-day management and strategic operations of the firm. His transition into leadership reflects both preparation and promise.

Together, Mrs. Gumbs and Denroy are carrying forward the Leeward Construction legacy, supported by a dedicated leadership team, including lead foreman and emerging contractor, Ruvin Richardson, who was groomed by Mr. Gumbs for over fifteen years. The company’s supervisors, field workers, and administrative staff continue to uphold the standards and reputation that have defined the Leeward Construction brand for decades.

Even as the organization navigates the natural uncertainty and grief that follow such a profound loss, its work presses on. Current efforts include multiple active projects and the ongoing construction of the Patience Gumbs Road—known locally as the South Hill Road.

In every task and every finished structure, the team honors the memory of Vernon Leroy Gumbs. Leeward Construction Co. Ltd remains steadfast in delivering what he championed throughout his life: “Quality and Speed”.

The new directors of Leeward Construction have created the Leroy Gumbs: Leeward Legacy Educational Grant. This grant will empower aspiring construction professionals ages 18-35 to provide financial assistance in achieving their career goals. The need to fund interested persons address the growing demand for skilled talent in the construction industry.

This fund will provide financial assistance to persons who are interested in pursuing tertiary education in areas of general construction, interior and exterior design, architecture and engineering. Persons desiring a trade certificate are also eligible.

We are therefore seeking your assistance and partnership in meeting this need. No contribution is too small. You can deposit your gift to any one of the accounts listed at Liberty Co-operative Credit Union or make a direct transfer.

USD ACCOUNT#14965-17
ECD ACCOUNT#14965-07

Thank you for your kind consideration and being a part of this endeavour. We are eternally grateful.

On the evening of Sunday December 7th 2025, on the beach front, just north of Elvis Restaurant and Bar in Sandy Ground, Avenella K. Griffith introduced to the public her second and newest book in the series Sandy Ground Tales. This new edition, entitled “Fishermen”, portrays a collection of fisher-folk stories indicative of the way of life that historically characterized the quaint sea-fearing village of Sandy Ground – the locality of Anguilla’s commercial seaport.
Through “Fishermen” Avenella relates the experiences of two outstanding Sandy Ground fishermen, namely Edwin “Ed” Carty and Aristo Richardson, as well as – to a lesser extent – Sam Webster, from the eastern fishing village of Island Harbour. And, by virtue of her admiration for the culture on which the sea-loving villagers thrive, Avenella pays tribute to all fisher-folk of Anguilla who are known for providing sustenance from the sea for their families, friends or free enterprise.
At the beginning of the ceremony, Pastor Lesley Richardson, Avenella’s pastor, offered a prayer of thanksgiving for the writing talents of the author. The playing of the National Song was then rendered by renowned saxophonist, Elliot Gumbs.
Moderator of the Ceremony was KCN-TV’s personality, Rosanna Browne, who gave some sterling commentary on “Fishermen”, and applauded Avenella for the fine quality of her new production: “Through these stories, Avenella gently reminds us of her resilience, humility, courage and community spirit – qualities that have always anchored the people of Sandy Ground,” Ms. Browne noted. “In ‘Fishermen’, her work also adds historical meaning, capturing a way of life that is both timeless and evolving, ensuring that future generations could come to know and appreciate the people who cast their nets, not only into the sea for a catch, but into the heart of this island’s cultural identity,” she added.
Congratulatory remarks also came from Ms. Susan Hodge, the Secretary of the Anguilla Fisher-folk Association: “On behalf of the Anguilla Fisher-folk Association, I want to recognize and sincerely thank Avenella for capturing these stories. If we do not write our own stories,” she opined, “someone else will write them for us, and we may no longer be the heroes of our stories.”
The Department of Youth and Culture was instrumental in the publishing of “Fishermen”. Its Director, Avon Carty, also conveyed congratulatory commentary: “Today, I am honoured and excited to be able to bring remarks and congratulations on behalf of my Permanent Secretary, Dr. Bonnie Richardson-Lake, and my team at the Department of Youth and Culture.”
“We have a small budget,” she acknowledged, “but it is still enough to help our local authors write our stories. We want to make sure that when our children read, they are not only reading about ‘windy willows and rivers’ that we can’t relate to, but it is important for our children to read our own stories. Avenella has given us this opportunity, as a people, to have our own stories written in our own voices,” Ms. Carty claimed.
Also on hand for the launch was Pastor Phillip Gumbs of the Church of God (Holiness) who is a close acquaintance and affiliate of Avenella. He was chosen to present a snippet of the first story from the pages of “Fishermen”, which was a horrific tale of one dreadful day when a few of Sandy Ground’s fishermen chanced to ply in the waters called The North, where other fishermen before them had feared to tread.
To Sandy Ground’s fishermen, The North had presented itself as a kind of invincible Goliath, and on one particular morning in the 1960s, three brave fish-hunters took on the challenge to venture out in The North – in the ominous waters of the Atlantic. But when they failed to return home within a reasonable timeframe, the entire Sandy Ground community got worried and feared The North had devoured them. Sadly, the three had never returned.
So, Pastor Gumbs read: “The North seemingly besieged the Sandy Ground fishermen and filled their hearts with fear. Like Goliath he defied them as if to challenge ‘Ah yuh come out here, if ah yuh so bad!’ His challenge seemed valid, until early one morning, Ed, that one fearless Sandy Ground fisherman, arose to take on the dreaded North. Five hours later, there were great shouts and applause across the village to welcome Ed and his two fellow fishers back into The Bay. Like David, with one throw, Ed had knocked out Goliath cold, cold and chopped off his head…”
Mrs. Rita Celestine Carty, one of Anguilla’s more prolific writers, was designated to present a review of the book.
“Ladies and gentlemen, the second book in the Sandy Ground Tales series is here,” she said. “Avenella K. Griffith has brought out ‘Fishermen’, highlighting the inspiring fishing exploits of Messrs Ed Carty and Aristo Richardson. We know them well, and we love them deeply. But this knowledge and this affection are now lifted to a higher level…We had her book ‘Boatmen’, and once again in ‘Fishermen’, Avenella K. Griffith ensures that stories of Anguilla and its incredible people are indelibly recorded…”
“In this collection of stories,” Mrs. Carty observed, “Avenella reveals the authenticity and rhythm of the language and the idiom. In the first story, the “jargon or fishing lingo tantalizes our ears even when we are not sure of the meaning of her terms like coble boats; sweeps; live-well; frilling the boat; and transom. The themes highlight in true old-fashion the Anguillian traditions of working hard to own your own and looking out for your own…”
Then, in presenting her extensive address, Avenella stated in part: “Thanks to God for Sandy Ground. Here is where I grew up, and I think it is the best. I thank God for depositing in me the privilege to write, so that in generations to come our young ones can read Sandy Ground Tales.”
“This village has hundreds of stories,” she said, “and I give God thanks for allowing me to publish “Fishermen”, the second one in the series, after ‘Boatmen’ which was published back in 2021.” After elaborating much on the journey which brought her to this destination, Avenella voiced her sincere honour and gratitude to all who assisted her in the project in one way or another.
She thanked all of her friends and associates who had helped to make the book become a reality, and she expressed her appreciation to all those who had contributed behind the scenes to make the launch of “Fishermen” such a success, as well as to all who had come out on the Sunday evening to show their support.
Avenella delightfully presented complimentary copies of “Fishermen” in respect of three individual fishermen, who had played an indispensible role in providing her with information for the creation of the book. These included the renowned sea-fearing stalwarts, Ed Carty and Aristo Richardson, as well as William “Uncle” Connor (deceased) whose book was accepted by his caregiver, Marzena Connor, on behalf of his son, Keith in Australia.
A prayer of blessing on the book was offered by Pastor Lindsey Richardson. At the end of the ceremony, several persons went forward to purchase a copy, as well as to patronize the author herself who had creatively made provision for the sale of Anguilla’s “roas fish on de wire”; fried fish; bar-b-qued fish; fish cakes, fried cakes; “roas corn”; johnny cakes; and good “ole-fashioned sugar ‘n water” – familiar delicacies from Anguillian culture.

By: James R. Harrigan

Did you know that the first Chapter of our 1982 constitution – after many exceptions to “freedoms” – concludes by describing how civil rights may be suspended in a state of public emergency? Here goes…

Section 14: Derogations from fundamental rights and freedoms under emergency powers
This Section asserts, “Nothing contained in or done under the authority of any law shall be held to be inconsistent with or in contravention of section 3 or section 13 of this Constitution to the extent that the law authorises the taking during any period of public emergency of measures that are reasonably justifiable for dealing with the situation that exists in Anguilla during that period.” [1] That’s it.

Section 15: Protection of persons detained under emergency laws – Protection??
In a “public emergency” and with only “reasonable” criteria, we all risk imprisonment without recourse.

It states, “When a person is detained by virtue of any such law as is referred to in section 14 of this Constitution the following provisions shall apply, that is to say—he shall, as soon as reasonably practicable and in any case not more than four days after the commencement of his detention, be furnished with a statement in writing in a language that he understands specifying in detail the grounds upon which he is detained; not more than fourteen days after the commencement of his detention, a notification shall be published in the Official Gazette stating that he has been detained and giving particulars of the provision of law under which his detention is authorised; not more than one month after the commencement of his detention and thereafter during his detention at intervals of not more than six months, his case shall be reviewed by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law … he shall be afforded reasonable facilities to consult a legal representative of his own choice who shall be permitted to make representations to the tribunal appointed for the review of the case of the detained person; and at the hearing of his case … he shall be permitted to appear in person or by a legal representative of his own choice.”[1]

But wait. Subsection (2) continues, “On any review by a tribunal in pursuance of this section of the case of a detained person, the tribunal may make recommendations concerning the necessity or expediency of continuing his detention to the authority by which it was ordered but, unless it is otherwise provided by law, that authority shall not be obliged to act in accordance with any such recommendations.”[1]

And a potentially innocent person without means to pay for a lawyer could be left in prison… for life? The Section concludes, “(3) Nothing contained in subsection (1)(d) or subsection (1)(e) of this section shall be construed as entitling a person to legal representation at public expense.” [1]

Section 16: Enforcement of protective provisions
Next, Section 16 asserts that anyone who thinks their rights have been denied as enshrined in “…sections 2 to 15 (inclusive) of this Constitution…(or, … if any other person alleges such a contravention in relation to the detained person), then…that person may apply to the High Court for redress.” [1]But such “protection” is without meaning for anyone without means.
This section continues, “The High Court shall have original jurisdiction” over claims to such rights, but “…Provided that the High Court may decline to exercise its powers under this subsection if it is satisfied that adequate means of redress for the contravention alleged are or have been available to the person concerned under any other law.” Good luck with redress without resources. And “any court (other than the Court of Appeal, the High Court or a court martial)” may “…refer the question to the High Court unless, in his opinion, the raising of the question is merely frivolous or vexatious.” [1] Subsections 4 to 6 then describe escalation to the Legislature and the Chief Justice. Really? With such alarming rules for detention during a public emergency, the committee should “decline” to retain Sections 15 and 16, full stop. We deserve the same rights and due process as given to anyone arrested at any time, all the time.

Section 17: Declaration of emergency
Section 17 says, “The Governor may, by Proclamation… in the Official Gazette, declare that a state of emergency exists for the purposes of this Chapter.” [1] The Governor may revoke the state of emergency in the same manner, but without further declaration, it would expire in 90 days. Detained? Good luck.

Section 18: Interpretation and savings
The final Section defines various terms, including citizenship, which was amended in 2019. The public emergency definition includes the UK being at war. Let us pray that NATO won’t go to war with Venezuela to help its largest member.

…and GST? More Laws Leaving the People in Purgatory

While the General Services Tax Act exposes us to 26 imprisonment penalties, they are specified from 3 months to 2 years without such infinite discretion. Whereas excess “input tax” is carried for 3 tax periods before allowing claims. Two months hence – or 10 days after an audit “if later” – the refund must offset any other taxes before proceeding (=5 months). But, if the “Comptroller fails to pay a refund of tax relating to an excess” it attracts 1% interest per month, until the refund is made.[2] The refund may as well be detained in a state of emergency.

Part 10 gives 90 days to object (=8 months), and the Comptroller has 90 more to consider it (=11 months). If the claim “succeeds” – the refund is due in 30 days (=1 year) – but, if “not refunded before the expiry of 30 days…” it accrues interest without limit. Note: if objecting to a GST assessment, 50% of the disputed amount must be paid, followed by 90 days for consideration.[2]

These times add up to 12 months from excess tax payment – while the Comptroller has the option to merely accrue 1% simple monthly interest. But, an appeal is allowed at 15 months, and the Comptroller has 90 days to object or be presumed to do so. If the Appeals Tribunal awards a refund, it would accrue interest after 30 days if not paid, approaching 19 months. But within 90 days thereafter, it may be appealed to the High Court. With an unknown length of review, if the Court awards a refund as the matter continues over 2 years, it would again merely accrue interest after 30 days if still not paid! [2]

Remember, one requires means for such rights to be meaningful. Section 42 is clear: “The burden of proving that an assessment is excessive or that a decision of the Comptroller is wrong is on the person objecting to the assessment or decision.” [2] How many legal bills (plus 13% GST!) would be more than the refund in question to “succeed” in getting what is rightfully owed? If ever.

Protections vs. Purgatory?
The public emergency sections about Constitutional “freedoms” and “protections” are appalling. They describe how an innocent person mistakenly detained in such circumstances could languish indefinitely. And…The General Services Tax Act vests powers to legally withhold excess tax payments – indefinitely!

Making the People plead for review or consideration reflects a pattern of disrespect, whether trapped in prison, or capriciously withholding capital while merely accruing interest, putting business liquidity, jobs, and the stability of the tax base at risk. We must stop electing leaders who pass such oppressive laws and fail to replace false “freedoms” with real rights, year after year.

So. Will Anguilla set new global standards for all democracies with this Constitutional review? And… Will our revised constitution have real “protections” from indefinite detention and funds retention in laws like the General Services Tax (GST) Act, even as they reflect “legal” overreach, right now?

Repeal GST – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1] The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] General Services Act, 2025.

The final Cock Tales episode of the year didn’t tiptoe around anything. Held on Saturday, 22nd November 2025, and themed “Rhymes, Rage and Reality: Music, Youth and Violence”, the conversation landed right in the middle of International Men’s Week. For host Diquan Reid, it was the perfect moment—not just to “celebrate men and boys,” as he put it, but to take an unfiltered look at the forces shaping them.

Joining him were Devin Hodge and Lesroy Lake, two voices who combined research, raw honesty, and a clear worry about where young Anguillian men are heading.

From the start, Hodge made it clear: youth violence isn’t just a “young people problem”—it’s a public health issue. Young men, he said, are both the main perpetrators and victims, and the ripple effects hit everyone. Families. Schools. Healthcare. The justice system. “Men sit central to a lot of the incidents of youth violence,” he said, stressing how important the Department of Youth and Culture is in addressing the issue.

Lake drove the point home with a blunt truth: Anguilla’s prison is filled with men under 40. To him, the problem starts long before crime—“Men are actually neglected… there is no support or not much support for men.” In homes. In schools. In society.

And that neglect, the panel argued, shows up everywhere.

One of the strongest threads of the night was simple but heavy: what children see, they repeat. Lake said it plainly —“Violence does breed violence.” Kids absorb the patterns they witness, especially from fathers or father figures.
Hodge added that violence in small communities like Anguilla often has layers. Old conflicts don’t die; they’re inherited. Generational grudges get retold until they become part of young men’s identities. “From geopolitics to neighbourhood spats,” he said, the cycle repeats.

But both men agreed: cycles can be broken. Just not by accident.

When the conversation turned to music, the debate around Trinibad and other violent genres brought out some of the strongest opinions of the night. Hodge pointed out that many Trinibad artists themselves admit the line between “crime and music” is paper-thin. That, he warned, is where the real danger lies.

He didn’t argue that music creates violence, but he emphasized its influence. Everyone understands how music sets a mood — gospel for Christians in the morning, romantic R&B for date nights, hype tracks in the gym. So why pretend violent lyrics don’t also have emotional impact? Reid took a different angle. For him, the real pull of “badman” music is the lifestyle it advertises. Flashy jewellery. Power. Fearlessness. Respect. For teens without money or stability, that image is magnetic and music videos become roadmaps.

No one on the panel supported banning music, but they all agreed that not every song belongs in every space. Hodge recalled being at a community event when a song about “spitting skulls” blasted through speakers — with children present. That, he said, is where the line should be drawn. Reid floated the idea of fines for promoters who play explicit music around kids, noting that high schoolers overwhelmingly supported stricter limits. Lake countered that the real issue starts at home, where toddlers sing along to violent or sexual lyrics because adults normalize them.

And of course, as audience members reminded everyone: how do you regulate anything when a child with a smartphone can access the entire internet at any time?

Reid argued that music has always reflected society — calypsonians were airing dirty laundry long before TikTok. The difference now, he said, is that “we are desensitised and it’s normalized.” Not glorified. Just… shrugged off. Lake added that even toddlers are mimicking sexually suggestive dances, and adults brush it aside as “culture.” In the rush to seem trendy or unbothered, harmful behaviour slips through the cracks.

Local teacher, Neil Gumbs, in the audience, shared that he grew up surrounded by community support so violent lyrics never shaped him. Many young people today don’t have that buffer. Lake agreed, saying that even children raised with solid values can be swept up by peers, especially when friends feel like the only stable thing in their lives.

Hon. Merrick Richardson pushed the conversation deeper. Violent music doesn’t exist alone, he argued. It mixes with video games, early marijuana use, group pressures, and the emotional chaos of adolescence. Together, they “blur the lines.”

“You are what you listen to,” he said, especially when your brain is still developing and your guard is down. He also lamented how disconnected today’s youth are from moral grounding. Church attendance is down. Community leagues have faded. “That little voice saying, ‘this is wrong’ — a lot of children don’t hear it anymore,” he said.

Nobody sugar-coated the reality: parents are tired, young, stretched thin, and often doing their best with limited tools. Reid acknowledged that while parental controls help, it’s hard for someone working two jobs to monitor every lyric, video, or TikTok trend.

Lake added that parents often hand down their own media habits—good or bad. Expensive devices get used as pacifiers. Cycles repeat.

An audience member pointed out something many adults already feel — the people teens look up to are often the most entertaining, not the most responsible. Reid answered with a wrestling metaphor: if society wants healthier role models, it can’t just hope young men notice them. It has to “put all the lights, all the bells and whistles” behind them.

But Hodge revealed a harder truth: mentorship programmes often struggle to find male volunteers. “We find more women than men,” he said. Boys end up “raised to be boys and not men.”

Hodge highlighted how unforgiving the system can be. One early mistake and a young man becomes an outcast. He referenced the UK’s “spent convictions” system and argued Anguilla needs similar reform.

Reid added that economic inequality on the island feeds resentment. Many young men feel stuck at “the bottom,” and the frustration becomes combustible.

Sports came up frequently as one of the few reliable safety nets left. Coaches talked about watching teens release anger, find discipline, and gain confidence through physical activity and mentorship. Young men, they said, “follow what they see.” They need more examples of healthy conflict resolution, not fewer. Hodge called for significant investment in safe, welcoming spaces where young men from different communities can interact. Sports facilities. Community centres. Mentorship hubs. By 2028, he hopes Anguilla will have a dedicated facility focused solely on supporting young men.

Audience members also highlighted school initiatives like “Speak Your Truth,” aimed at addressing emotional trauma early. But they warned that unless older men confront their own issues, the next generation will inherit them unchanged.

By the end of the night, one thing was clear: the challenges facing young men don’t come from one source. They come from everywhere — music, culture, technology, absent fathers, strained households, drugs, violence, inequality, and a loss of community structure.

But the panel didn’t end on hopelessness. They stressed that change is possible and already beginning. Through intentional mentorship, stronger institutions, proactive parenting, moral teaching, and rebuilding community spaces, Anguilla can reshape the environment young men grow up in.

By Janissa Fleming

As we continue to consider our constitution, we have seen that the first 12 sections of the 1982 Order described “constitutional” freedoms that lack assurances. Most began with clear rights declarations, followed by exceptions. But Section 13 puts exceptions ahead of any rights!
Section 13: “Protection from discrimination on the grounds of race, etc”
Another fundamental liberty in any democracy is for the rule of law to treat everyone fairly, without fear or favour. Section 13 offers exceptions before such rights: “(1) Subject to the provisions of subsections (4), (5) and (7) of this section, no law shall make any provision which is discriminatory either of itself or in its effect.” [1] Oh, wait. What exceptions do subsections 4, 5 and 7 make?
Subsection 2 continues with exceptions: “(2) Subject to the provisions of subsections (6), (7) and (8) of this section, no person shall be treated in a discriminatory manner by any person acting by virtue of any written law or in the performance of the functions of any public office or any public authority.”[1]
Subsection 3 finally addresses the Section title: “(3) In this section, the expression ‘discriminatory’ means affording different treatment to different persons attributable wholly or mainly to their respective descriptions by race, place of origin, political opinions, colour or creed whereby persons of one such description are subjected to disabilities or restrictions to which persons of another such description are not made subject or are accorded privileges or advantages which are not accorded to persons of another such description.” [1] Okay, sounds promising. But…

…but not for non-belongers?
Subsection 4 excludes immigrants and tourists, saying, “(4) Subsection (1) of this section shall not apply to any law so far as that law makes provision—with respect to persons who do not belong to Anguilla;” where it acknowledges that non-citizens may hew to other laws. It continues, “for the application, in the case of persons of any such description as is mentioned in subsection (3) of this section (or of persons connected with such persons), of the law with respect to adoption, marriage, divorce, burial, devolution of property on death or other like matters which is the personal law of persons of that description;”[1] Yes, this is from the Order. Verbatim. But what about people who marry under our laws? Or alien landholders’ rights for their heirs? Exceptions?
And the fourth subsection adds, “or for the imposition of taxation or appropriation of revenue by the Government of Anguilla or any local authority or body for local purposes.” [1] This must be how it is constitutional to charge stamp taxes, work permit and tourist visa fees, higher departure fees, or even different rates of property tax to non-citizens after they may have invested their life savings to join the community. Hmm.

…With exceptions to exceptions!
But then, exceptions to exceptions start flying in Subsections 5 to 7, “(5) Nothing contained in any law shall be held to be inconsistent with or in contravention of subsection (1) of this section to the extent that it makes provision with respect to qualifications for service as a public officer, or as a member of a disciplined force or for the service of a local government authority or a body corporate established by any law for public purposes.” And Subsection 6 continues, “(6) Subsection (2) of this section shall not apply to anything which is expressly or by necessary implication authorised to be done by any such provision of law as is referred to in subsection (4) or (5) of this section.” [1] Wait. What?
Whereas Subsection 7 seems hopeful if one reads it several times, but what lawyer anywhere would go before a magistrate to make a case based on this: “(7) Nothing contained in or done under the authority of any law shall be held to be inconsistent with or in contravention of this section to the extent that the law in question makes provision whereby persons of any such description as is mentioned in subsection (3) of this section may be subjected to any restriction on the rights and freedoms guaranteed by sections 5, 8, 10, 11 and 12 of this Constitution, being such a restriction as is authorised by paragraph (a), (b) or (g) of subsection (3) of section 5, subsection (2) of section 8, subsection (6) of section 10, subsection (2) of section 11,or subsection (2) of section 12, as the case may be.” [1] Aren’t laws for all meant to be clear enough for all to follow?
And then, Subsection 8 appears to repeat earlier exceptions, “(8) Nothing in subsection (2) of this section shall affect any discretion relating to the institution, conduct or discontinuance of civil or criminal proceedings in any court that is vested in any person by or under this Constitution or any other law.” [1] Suggesting that any judge and any law might apply “discretion” as they see fit in the future. Voila.

Anguilla Must Lead – Not Follow “Leading” Nations!
In 2024, the largest democracy in the world eroded religious freedom by advancing the Citizenship (Amendment) Act. It facilitates citizenship for “immigrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan – provided they are not Muslim”…with the party in power shifting India from a secular democracy of 1.3 billion into a majoritarian rule based on religion.[2] Does their constitution perhaps share British roots that allow “any law” to erode rights?
In another large democracy, long awaited gender equality also ended. It took until 1963 to entitle women to equal pay in America – just four years before Anguilla’s revolution.[3] But, in 2022, women lost their constitutional right to privacy, and in turn, their ability to protect that economic equality.[4] By 2025, 19 US states banned or limited women’s rights, which has been associated with more frequent maternal and infant deaths and greater rates of economic insecurity.[5]
In Anguilla, discrimination based on the “place of origin” emerged with the passage of both the 2021 and 2025 GST laws. Specifically, both laws require business records to be in English. This discriminated against anyone who had previously enjoyed not only freedom from forced oaths, inspection without warrants, testifying against oneself – but also the privacy and freedom to keep records in whatever language they chose. In addition to a culturally intrusive demand, the laws allow that, “the Comptroller may, by notice in writing, require the person keeping the record to provide at that person’s expense a translation into English by a translator selected by the Comptroller for this purpose.” [6] Before GST, this disadvantage based on “place of origin” and language preferences did not exist for members of the private sector. Time to lead – and stop electing leaders who pass laws to destroy our rights and impoverish our people.

A Constitution or a Compromise?
The expression “Go Big or Go Home” comes to mind regarding the review of the Anguilla constitution, which is an amalgam of the 1982 Order and amendment bills. Our “people” have made Anguilla an exceptional destination for decades, which is consistent with our egalitarian society. Is continuing with a constitution that allows exceptions to equality consistent with who we are as a nation?
Will new clauses help protect AI revenues for the financial independence needed to protect our civil rights and our democracy? Or will a lack of constitutional guardrails and spending reserves leave us vulnerable to “policy based loans” and humiliating conditions of aid after the next big storm?
Will Anguilla set new standards for democracies around the world, or continue following with one compromise after another? And… Will our revised constitution have the clarity to deem laws like the General Services Tax (GST) unconstitutional, even as it revokes our righteous rights, right now?

Repeal GST – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.
This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1]The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [2] https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/11/asia/india-citizenship-amendment-act-bjp-intl; [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Pay_Act_of_1963; [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade; [5] https://www.cnn.com/us/abortion-access-restrictions-bans-us-dg; [6] Goods and Services and General Services Acts, 2021 and 2025.

Anguillians of all ages gathered at the Old Valley Boys School on Wednesday, 12th November 2025 for Testimonial Night — an intimate, heartfelt evening of stories and reflection hosted by the Anguilla Diabetes Association. The event formed part of a week of activities held from 8th–15th November in recognition of Diabetes Awareness Week, under the global theme “Diabetes and Wellbeing: Focus on Diabetes in the Workplace”.
The night’s purpose was simple yet profound — to bring people together to share real experiences of living with diabetes, to educate, and to remind the community that no one faces the condition alone.

Opening the evening, Ellenita Harrigan of the Anguilla Diabetes Association reminded attendees that diabetes remains one of the world’s most pervasive chronic illnesses. “Over 514 million people have been diagnosed with diabetes,” she said. “And most of these people are in the workforce.” Harrigan spoke passionately about the social stigma that too often surrounds the condition. “Diabetes seems to be a societal disease — people don’t like it and are hesitant to share that they have it,” she said. “But these gatherings help us realise we are not alone.”
She explained that the Association’s annual week of activities is designed to build awareness, offer knowledge, and strengthen community support. “Sometimes you think you are suffering on your own until you hear someone else say they are having the same problems — managing their sugar, struggling with diet, feeling frustrated by test results. Coming together helps us to share, to support one another, and to learn.”

Among the evening’s most moving stories was that of Mario Bryan, who has lived with diabetes for twenty-five years. His journey, however, took a sharp turn after a near-fatal heart attack in 2020. “I used to be careless with my blood sugar,” he admitted. “I’d eat anything and say, ‘You gotta die some way, somehow.’ But after that heart attack, it really opened my eyes.”

The experience transformed his relationship with food, health, and discipline. “I learned what raises my sugar and what doesn’t,” he explained. His approach now is one of careful balance, sharing how he has made fruit, fish, and fresh vegetables the core of his diet. Exercise is also non-negotiable. “

The results have been remarkable. “My HbA1C was 13.5 when I had my heart attack. It’s now 6.8,” Bryan said proudly. He credits his progress to self-discipline and intermittent fasting — eating only between 1 p.m. and 7 p.m. — and no longer requires insulin.

Yet, he was quick to acknowledge that emotional well-being plays an equally vital role. “Rest is very important and stress also affects your sugar. You have to take care of your mind too.”

Dr. Robyn Perkins-Kentish commended Bryan’s discipline but reminded attendees that not all diabetics can safely adopt the same routine. “I would advise that you consult your doctor before,” she said firmly. “Medicine is not a cookie-cutter thing.” She warned that certain medications — especially long-acting insulin — can make fasting dangerous if doses are not adjusted. “You can end up collapsing,” she said. “I’ve had patients who died in their sleep because they adjusted their diet but not their medication. You have to do it safely.”

Bryan, a taxi driver by trade, also spoke about managing his condition on the job. He keeps snacks such as nuts and biscuits within reach and has trained his family and colleagues to recognise the signs of high and low blood sugar. “When lunchtime hits, the first thing my coworkers say is, ‘Yo, time for you to eat,’” he said with a smile. “It’s important that people around you know what to do.”

He encouraged others to be open about their condition. “You’re not asking for pity — you’re protecting yourself,” he said.

To reinforce healthy eating habits, participants took part in a “food plate” exercise led by Nurse Dana Ruan. Three individuals displayed plates showing what they typically eat in a day — some healthier than others. Using these examples, Ruan demonstrated the ideal balance: “Your meal should be a quarter starch, a quarter protein, and half vegetables.”

She cautioned against “starchy vegetables” such as pumpkin and carrots being mistaken for greens, and warned that sugary condiments like ketchup and barbecue sauce can quietly sabotage healthy eating. “You can eat out,” she said, “but it’s what you select. Eat the broccoli, for example — but don’t put cream and cheese all over it.”

The night’s emotional depth continued with the testimony of Sherri-Ann Roberts, who had to manage her diabetes while pregnant. “I thought once I had the baby, I wouldn’t have to take insulin anymore,” she recalled. But her baby was born prematurely with dangerously high blood sugar and required a transfusion to survive.
A year later, Roberts’ own symptoms returned. Her blood sugar was 306 when she finally sought help.

Over the years, Roberts – like Mario – has learned that stress, lack of sleep, and poor mental health can wreak havoc on blood sugar. “Stress is a dangerous thing,” she said. “Rest is very important. Your mental health is very important. Going to the beach, relaxing — we need to do more of that.”

She urged listeners to pay attention to their bodies and not delay care. “If your toe is hurting, even if you don’t think you’re diabetic, go to the clinic. Don’t wait until it’s too late.”

Nurse Ruan echoed that every diabetic’s experience is unique. “One thing about diabetes — it teaches you about your body,” she said. “You learn what you react to and how you respond to food.” If sugar levels rise, she advised simple steps: drink half a litre of water, wait an hour, and check again. But if symptoms worsen — such as vomiting or fatigue — “you need to go to the hospital,” she stressed.

Dr. Perkins-Kentish also offered practical, long-term advice: regular check-ups, consistent monitoring, and attention to eye and foot care. “Don’t neglect your feet,” she warned. “The smallest of things cause amputations if they’re not addressed quickly.”
She urged patients not to self-adjust medication. “You cannot just go to the pharmacy and collect your meds if you have not seen a doctor recently,” she said. Comparing the human body to a car, she noted, “You check your brake pads, but we never got any check engine lights.”

In closing, Dr. Perkins-Kentish reflected on the shared journey of living with diabetes — one that extends beyond medicine. “Your struggle is not just yours so you don’t have to face it alone,” she said. “You may fall off, but you just got to get back on track.”

As the evening drew to a close, the message was clear: diabetes is not just a condition, but a community challenge that requires awareness, compassion, and constant effort.

Thomas Paine, writing in his seminal pamphlet, “Common Sense” about government, had this to say. “Most writers confuse society with government. They are not only different but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness. The former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections; the latter negatively by restraining our devices. The one encourages intercourse; the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last is a punisher.”

Paine goes on to say, “society in any state is a blessing, but government in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer or are exposed to the same miseries we might expect in a country without a government, our calamity is heightened. By reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.” In other words, the ones that we voted for with their grand promises, are the same ones who turn their backs on us.

In a democracy, it is the people and not the politicians that have the power to affect change. In Anguilla, it seems appointed civil servants have even more of that power. The British Westminster system of government winners take all; an elective dictatorship if you will, that can do whatever it pleases, sans checks and balances. Politicians are allotted a five-year term to seek the favor of the public servants’ massive voting block by beating down the opposition, and ignoring the people, who must wait till the next ballot to affect change again.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States of America remarked, “the future of a country is directly linked to the current opportunities available to its young people. Children are the most valuable resource and the best hope for its future.” In Anguilla, we keep seeing the same nonsense. Inflated budgets, people taxed to death, living conditions unchanged, young people fleeing offshore, because they cannot survive, yet the red carpet greets foreign investors ripe for bleeding of taxes and fees as our people wander like nomads in search of a better way of life.

Over the last several years, we have lost over three thousand of our best and brightest, one fifth of us. Our esteemed leaders would do well to ask why is this happening? Could it be that life in Anguilla is unsustainable, that young entrepreneurs face too many hurdles to start businesses, or is it that we are cast aside after casting our votes? Look at the civil service, how it operates, who oversees it for some answers.

It is said that leadership determines how subordinates behave and perform by setting the organizational culture, communicational style and approach to work. A leader’s actions influence employee motivation, collaboration, an adherence to rules as well as their willingness to think and work outside the box, handle conflicts and engage with peers.

It is the job of the government, any government to do for the people what they can’t do for themselves, and by extension to provide essential public services to the people with dignity and respect. This work ranges from providing direct services like air traffic control and managing the public health system which guarantees that the ER is always staffed, to ensure public education, public safety, handling administrative duties, Customs and Immigration. In other words, Public Service is the life’s blood without which the body would die.

Public servants are supposed to be hired and promoted on performance and tenure, rather than a “who you fer,” or political affiliation, to ensure stability and impartiality and uphold the common good. Simply put, the civil service is supposed to serve the people and not the other way around. Such services have no room for vindictiveness or bias. Hopefully, that is not the intended practice, however, we hear stories time after time of rogue civil servants who behave as if they’re doing you a favor, being uncooperative and rude. Getting anything done in Anguilla is often described as harder than a root canal. When it comes to settling issues, it is left up to you to make the case, being asked for receipts dating back years, and then being ignored, without responses; after repeated queries, if ever.

While some civil servants try their best, others act as if they have the power to do whatever they want, as if the civil service is out of control. They treat us like second class citizens and we ask, who are these arrogant and condescending civil servants and how did they accumulate so much power? Why do they make it so difficult for us to do business in our own country? Is it that they work for other appointed civil servants, instead of our elected ministers? Do their leaders care about the way in which they serve the people?

Barbadian Prime Minister the Honorable Mia Motley, was spot on when she spoke at Cop 26 and said, “Leaders must Lead.” Where are our leaders and how can they continue to accept a constitution that’s as ancient as the pyramid at Giza, and general orders that delegate so much authority to the civil service?
It is the job of the Deputy Governor to oversee, among other things, the Public Service, to ensure the effective delivery of the government’s program and to uphold the values of good governance. That said, what then is the problem? With whom and where does the buck stop? It appears that the system needs a complete overhaul, as reflected in a recent consulting report (bean counters) on the public service sector.

A good leader is one that surrounds him or herself with competent people who will get the job done in a fair and equitable manner. A great leader knows all that goes on within his or her government. A great leader is one that represents all the people, not just the ones that voted for him or her. A great leader is one that does not acquiesce to the demands of the Crown at the expense of his or her constituents. At the end of the day, we are all Anguillians, and as such, should be treated with the dignity and respect that everyone deserves.

While our leaders bear the responsibility to represent everyone, we know without the shadow of a doubt, that’s not always the case. We’ve become polarized, and the fact that civil servants don’t work for them, much less the rest of us, leaves our people lost between the promises, the polls and what has been passed off as public service. So, when policies and how they choose to serve, are left up to those, our homegrown oppressors, to do as they please, the people are left as beggars, victims of politics of the belly in our own house.

My fellow Anguillians, we cannot continue this trajectory. Somewhere along the way, a “change’s gonna come,” to quote the Sam Cooke standard. Until we can look ourselves in the mirror and be honest with ourselves, we’ll continue the same path for which there is no destination. In Lewis Carrol’s “Alice in Wonderland,” the Cheshire Cat says to Alice, “If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.” Where are we going?

Earlier this year, we refused to follow the APM, the same guys who promised us “change that couldn’t wait.” They did the very same things that they said they wouldn’t do. I suspect that the current government has been misled to continue many of them in the interest of “continuity” between administrations, or is that “continuity” under a blind Crown that leaves the public service without leadership or a commitment to serve any interests but their own.

Anguilla does not appear to love or care for its own, because if it did, it would not make it next to impossible for our people to do business in their homeland. The business they need to pay their way, while chasing away the people our ministers were elected to prioritize over concrete. Whatever happened to people first? Till next time, may God bless Anguilla.

Until 2025, our understanding of “constitutional” was influenced by our awareness of the US Constitution. Its elegant simplicity enabled most anyone to say if something sounded “constitutional” or not. And it seems most of us assume our constitution enshrines the same rights as theirs. But lately theirs seems less reassuring than ours, which is a serious commentary on one’s community.

The First Amendment of the US Constitution
One of the most cited – and like our Sections 10, 11 and 12 – is the First Amendment to the US Constitution. It states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”[1]

Whereas our constitution allows future laws to limit such rights, like our first and second GST laws. They allow for searches without warrants, to being forced to testify against oneself, and take an oath against one’s will.[2] Fortunately, GST laws did not forbid our freedom of speech or the press to report on how GST was passed, despite our petitions – or the GST march.[3] But where would we be if they had?

Commentary: Protection of freedom of expression
If we continue examining our 1982 Order, Section 11 boldly begins: “11.(1) Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of expression, and… said freedom includes the freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference, and freedom from interference with his correspondence and other means of communication.” (e.g., writing and reading this article!) Then 11(2) says, but for, “…the authority of any law [that] makes provision… in the interests of defence, public safety, public order, public morality or public health;” Wait. By whose standards? And, 11(2)(b) adds guardrails, “…for the purpose of protecting the reputations, rights and freedoms of other persons or the private lives of persons concerned in legal proceedings,” and for privacy, “preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence…” [4]

But then, it allows for, “maintaining the authority and independence of the courts or regulating telephony, telegraphy, posts, wireless, broadcasting or television;”[4] That means the court could reverse the ruling on “Talk Your Mind”[5] and never run afoul of our constitution! But it concludes regarding restrictions on public officers if they are, “…shown to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society.” [4] Hmm. Another commentary on one’s community.

Community: Protection of freedom of assembly and association
Communal expression follows in Section 12—(1) “Except with his own consent, no person shall be hindered in the enjoyment of his freedom of peaceful assembly and association, that is to say, his right peacefully to assemble freely and associate with other persons and in particular to form or belong to trade unions or other associations for the protection of his interests” which the US amendment said simply as, “right of the people peaceably to assemble”. [1,4] One might also consider a peaceful protest as the “protection of one’s interests” – and might consider the GST petitions expressing outrage at its undemocratic passage and speed of signing the law as “communication” ? as afforded in Section 11.
Section 12 (2) continues, as no one shall be “required as a condition of employment to subscribe to any organisation for membership or admission; nor shall any person be required to pay dues or other compensation to secure or enjoy such employment or the right thereto; not* shall any person be prohibited from free access to his place of employment or return therefrom by virtue of his failure to belong or subscribe to any organisation.” So we had labour legislation in our constitution! [*and a typo]
However, Clause (3) then wraps itself with exceptions for future laws. It also states that one’s right to work without a union did not outlaw trade unions or activities that limit freedom to pursue a trade – “…unless that provision is contained in a written law…[or] … shown to be reasonably justifiable in a democratic society.” [4] Yet another serious commentary on one’s community.

Nepal Negating Rights for “National Interest”
In September, the government of Nepal passed registration regulations for social media platforms, and “deactivated” 26 noncompliant sites. Communications disruptions led to outrage. When protestors attempted to storm parliament, it was not exactly “peaceful assembly.” However, “Police responded with deadly and allegedly indiscriminate force…” killing 19 and injuring over 200. And now, “A series of draft bills governing press freedom and social media are under debate in Nepal’s parliament that could mean people are fined or jailed for content that is deemed against the ‘national interest’, and could … shut down newspapers and revoke the licences of journalists.”[6] Could similar laws to erode our rights?

Peruvian Protests, Police and Patrols
Another example of constitutional conflict emerged in October when police shot a popular rapper during a protest in Peru. A young organiser asserted that, “We have the constitutional right to protest…That right cannot be taken away from us by a police commander, a congressman – and certainly not by someone who pretends to be president…” However, the government had declared a state of emergency that “restricts freedom of movement and assembly” and allowed both police and the armed forces to patrol the streets.[7] Such constitutional rights were irrelevant for that rapper.

Constitutional Rights Challenging Constitutional Ruin
On October 11, more than 2,500 “No Kings” protests spanned 50 US states when more than 8 million Americans peacefully demonstrated against a president acting like a king. That is, like the one they had before independence and thankfully not like ours now. Donning absurd and playful costumes, street protestors’ signs included the preamble to the US Constitution, and millions more were honking car horns.[8,9] Ironically, they exercised their rights to protest the denial of others’ rights.

A Commentary on One’s Community
These events offer a serious commentary on each community, because a “community” reflects how people cooperate with one another to create “a democratic society”. Recent changes in the US are highlighting that the rights enshrined in our constitution, or any other, are only as binding and relevant as we, the People, want and trust our government to allow them to be.

Notably, exceptions for future laws in our constitution open the doors to the abuses happening in Nepal and Peru, as just two of countless historic examples. As such, “defence, public safety, public order, public morality or public health” might echo “content that is deemed against the ‘national interest’” while Peru is gripped by a state of emergency to restore public safety and order. And in the US, executive orders have bypassed laws entirely. So, for now, let us be thankful that the GST laws did not prohibit our right to free expression or peaceful assembly and association. But where would we be if they had?

Repeal GST – and pass a balanced budget bill. Now.

This article reflects issues raised on July 5, 2021, at the House Select Committee on GST Public Hearing.
[1]https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/bill-of-rights-transcript; [2] Goods and Services and General Services Acts, 2021 and 2025;[3] https://www.284media.com/regional/2022/07/01/anguilla-over-80-businesses-close-in-protest-and-defiance-of-the-impending-implementation-of-the-goods-and-services-tax-act-being-pushed-by-the-government-of-anguilla/; [4]The Anguilla Constitution Order 1982; [5] https://anguillabar.com/index.php/2013/04/12/special-court-sitting-anguilla-circuit-honours-john-benjamin-qc-at-the-inner-bar/; [6] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/08/nepal-bans-26-social-media-sites-including-x-whatsapp-and-youtube; [7] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/25/peru-youth-protesters-state-of-emergency-gen-z; [8] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/18/us/protests-trump-no-kings.html?unlocked_article_code=1.wE8.vcO-.eUW9wUZniQxN&smid=url-share; [9] https://www.facebook.com/AltUSNationalParkService/posts/our-confirmed-count-stands-at-81-million-participants-worldwide-for-yesterdays-n/1233293442174179/

In the heart of North Hill, where the rhythm of community life beats strong, one young man has quietly but determinedly carved a path as both a community figure and a youth leader. His name is Dominik Richardson, a familiar face on and off the water, known as much for his technical skills as for his growing voice in youth advocacy.

With a background in IT, Dominik’s name often comes up when someone’s computer starts acting up. “Most persons know that if they have a problem with their PCs, they can call me and I will try to work with them — especially the elderly,” he said. Yet beyond this, Dominik has been working on something less tangible but far more vital: fixing connections between Anguilla’s youth and the world around them.
Leadership, for Dominik, wasn’t something he chased. It was something that naturally unfolded. From leading youth activities at the Methodist Church in North Hill to guiding peers who “just seemed to look up to him,” he found himself stepping into roles that called for both confidence and compassion. “I can’t really tell you what I was exhibiting that made persons feel that way,” he reflected with a laugh. “But I was always given the role to read Scripture verses in church and lead the youth in any venture they had.”

Encouraged by fellow youth advocate Tishon Gumbs, Dominik eventually joined the National Youth Ambassadors Corps, and later became Anguilla’s CARICOM Youth Ambassador, representing the island at regional levels.
As part of the National Youth Ambassador Corps, Dominik serves in the advocacy subgroup — an important bridge between young people and policymakers. “If there’s an issue that we feel the youth want to speak on, I’d be responsible for letting persons in higher authority know that this is the voice of the youth,” he explained.
His work as a CARICOM Youth Ambassador took him to Jamaica in 2023, where he represented Anguilla at regional forums. Yet, as he pointed out, being from an associate member state has its limits. “It kind of hindered some of the stuff that I would have wanted to do… because we are not a member state,” he said. Still, the experience left an impression. “It was very good. The networking alone was amazing.”

For Dominik, the lessons of leadership didn’t come solely from meetings or conferences, they also came from the waves. As a member of the crew of The Satellite, one of North Hill’s well-known racing boats, he credits boat racing with shaping his teamwork and patience. “I wasn’t really a team player before, but with boat racing, it helped me to respect other persons, their ideas and the way they think,” he said. “Not because I see something as a six and they see it as a nine means it’s wrong — we just have two different perspectives.”
He sees potential in Anguilla’s national sport not only as a source of pride but as a form of youth engagement. “Most boats would need at least a crew of 20 to 30 persons, and I know for a fact every boat right now is struggling for crew members,” he noted. “It would benefit both the sport and the youth if we were to combine both things.”
As much as Dominik’s life revolves around leadership and the sea, technology remains at its core. His advocacy for responsible digital use comes from what he’s seen first-hand. “It’s very easy to manipulate IT,” he said. “Some persons do it out of curiosity, but some out of maliciousness.” He believes the internet should be used to uplift, not undermine. “Instead of going on and frolicking or damaging your brain with malicious websites,” he said candidly, “use it to help your business ventures or your schoolwork.”
When asked about the challenges facing Anguilla’s youth, Dominik didn’t hesitate. “The media they consume is affecting them badly,” he said, singling out the negative influence of some American music and entertainment. But he also believes the issue goes deeper — to the way children are raised. “I find that parents today are very lenient,” he observed. “They view their children more as friends than as children. When I was growing up, I was raised by a community. If I walked up the road and didn’t say good morning to somebody, by the time I reached by my grandmother, I would get washed out. That’s not happening anymore.”

It’s a candid assessment, but one grounded in genuine concern. For Dominik, rebuilding that sense of community discipline and mentorship is crucial to steering young Anguillians back on course.
Looking ahead, Dominik envisions a youth movement that’s inclusive and grounded in accountability. He hopes young people will stop seeing organisations like the National Youth Ambassador Corps as being “only for the crème de la crème.” Instead, he encourages them to “step outside the box and at least try to be a leader, or help a leader reach their goals.”
And to those who’ve lost faith in today’s generation, his message is simple: don’t give up. “Some persons feel like the youth in Anguilla are a lost cause, and I really disagree with that,” he said firmly.
“Even if you’re not a youth, don’t write us off. Everyone has a role to play, and together we can build a stronger and better Anguilla.”

By Janissa Fleming